2007 brings a new Driver's Handbook. This is the same book that all new drivers and those wanting to upgrade their licence must get. It's somewhat of a distillation, and usually a good explanation, of the Ontario HTA (Highway Traffic Act) and the regulations with some good advice thrown in.
I, perhaps like others, learned to ride my bike on the roads by studying a copy of the Driver's Handbook, and also by experience. Programs like CAN-BIKE or Effective Cyclist were not yet invented.
Why a new handbook? From a cyclist's perspective, the old handbook, copyright 2002, was lacking. It also doesn't hurt that the HTA has changed.
So what, from a cyclists perspective, in the HTA has changed? Well, there used to be a section in the law that required bicycles to always "stay as far to the right as practicable". In the old handbook, on page 30, it stated that "bicycles that cannot keep up with traffic should drive as close as possible to the right edge of the road."
That section of law is now gone. What's left is section 147(1)
Any vehicle travelling upon a roadway at less than the normal speed of traffic at that time and place shall, where practicable, be driven in the right-hand lane then available for traffic or as close as practicable to the right hand curb or edge of the roadway.
Also in the old handbook, again on page 30, was a sentence that read:
If the lane is wide enough, you may share it with the cyclist, keeping a safe distance to the cyclist's left. If the lane is not wide enough to share, the cyclist has the right to the whole lane.
Nowhere in the HTA does it allow one vehicle to share a lane with another. Which means that a cyclist should take the lane. One lane, one vehicle. Simple.
The new handbook also has a subsection titled "Sharing the road with cyclists", in the old one it was "Sharing the road with other vehicles". Having this new part is excellent, and it's worth repeating it in whole:
Bicycles and mopeds that cannot keep up with traffic are expected to keep to the right of the lane; however, they can use any part of the lane if necessary for safety, such as to avoid potholes and sewer grates. Cyclists need a metre on either side of themselves as a safety zone. When passing a cyclist, allow at least one metre between your car and the cyclist. If the lane is too narrow to share, change lanes to pass the cyclist. When turning right, signal and check your mirror and the blind spot to your right to make sure that you do not cut off a cyclist. When parked on the side of the street, look behind you and check your mirrors for a passing cyclist before opening a door.
The next place cyclists appear in the text in on page 50, where the handbook explains how to safely make a right turn. Here the advice that it offer is to check the blind spots and mirrors, and to let cyclists, mopeds, scooters, and motorcycles go through the intersection before the turn.
In a sub-section titled "Passing" on, pages 58 and 59, is the advice:
Watch for bicycles and small vehicles that may be hidden from view in front of the vehicle you are about to pass.
and also on page 59, the good advice continues:
Motorcycles, bicycles, limited speed motorcycles and mopeds often need to pull to the right or right side of their lane to avoid dangerous road conditions or to be seen by other drivers. Do not take this as an invitation to pass in the same lane. If you want to pass these vehicles, do so by changing lanes.
In total, six pages contain advice about interacting specifically with cyclists. This new handbook does a much better job of instructing drivers of how to interact with cyclists. Bicycles continue to be included in the illustrations. That's good too, because cyclists are out on our roads, and should be seen on the road in the drivers handbook. I was able to find 5 illustrations that includes cyclists on the roads. Additional illustrations deal with cyclists road signs.
My thanks to the efforts at the MTO for these improvements, and I hope that you also learned something.
Comments
Anonymous (not verified)
Finally more clearly worded!
Mon, 10/08/2007 - 13:49Finally more clearly worded! Now all they have to do is get $%#^%s in SUVs, vans and taxis to know, and follow, the rules. Hmm... maybe they ought to start with cops, eh?
Darren_S
OK
Mon, 10/08/2007 - 15:52So this will help drivers getting their license no, what about the people who have been driving for 10, 20, 30 years? Cause you know no one in government is willing to upset voters and their beliefs.
It would be an interesting stat to see which age category is most responsible for cycling/auto collisions. I am will to bet it is in the 35 to 50 category.
anthony
You're right, but...
Tue, 10/09/2007 - 00:53Darren, you're right.
This does not affect those who are not in the process of getting or upgrading their licence. While everyone should be continually re-educating themselves, you and I know that the overwhelming majority won't. They have their license, they pay their fees, and that's as much effort as they care to put in.
But this is still a welcome improvement, and we should continue to work to make it better.
Grisha B-V (not verified)
Speaking to sharing the
Fri, 10/12/2007 - 21:47Speaking to sharing the lane, the old law I think is better worded for roads where bicycle facilities do not exist, such as a country road or highway - it's impractical for a motor vehicle to not share the lane with a bicycle in these cases.
In the city, I also find it practical for me to ride with a left-bias so I can safely maneuver around vehicles that are right-turning or stopping vehicles from over-taking me unsafely.
Personally, I don't mind motorvehicles riding along side, as most drivers are courteous (and predictable; allowing clearance) when they see you obeying traffic laws.
John G. Spragge (not verified)
Passing in the same lane
Sat, 10/13/2007 - 02:32Passing any vehicle in the same lane requires care and attention. I would like to see two rules concerning this in the OHTA:
anthony
Better billing for cyclists in driver's handbook
Sun, 10/14/2007 - 19:18Bill Bean at "Take The Lane" also chimed in with Better billing for cyclists in driver's handbook after reading the new handbook.
He offers his suggestions for improvements, but agrees that this is an improvement in favour of cyclists. A good read. Thanks, Bill.
anthony
The new Driver's Handbook is now online
Mon, 01/28/2008 - 17:34The Ontario Driver's handbook is now online.
I like the way it starts off with this:
of particular note for cyclists are the sections titled:
But it is always good to review the handbook, as it contains much that useful information.
Aidan
1m on both sides equals a lane!
Mon, 01/28/2008 - 19:38Nobody in government has the stones to speak out of the front of their mouths to drivers:
Cyclists need a metre on either side of themselves as a safety zone. When passing a cyclist, allow at least one metre between your car and the cyclist... If the lane is too narrow to share, change lanes to pass the cyclist.
If I have a metre on both sides of me, I am in the centre of a lane as is the only safe way to ride. Say that! It should continue:
Since the lane is too narrow to share, change lanes to pass the cyclist.
In the real world, I'd have fat $%&holes with cop-beards on my $%& yelling at me to 'get on the sidewalk!' One of these can be expected some day to go postal on me, or merely give me the right-hook.
As 'a metre on either side' is the standard, enforce it! I have had this argument with people on the road, and with people at work who see me cycle to it. Nobody knows this, and most drivers have some bizarre reluctance to move their wheels into another empty lane to pass, much less wait behind you. Education and enforcement are sadly lacking, and enforcement is the only driving education that sticks. No coincidence that driving has gotten worse as enforcement of everything but speeding has stopped.