In case you haven't noticed, it's an election year in Toronto, and right-wing candidate Rossi in a bid to win some right-wing votes has made some bold statements about stopping unsafe and environmentally unsound bike lanes.
Rossi doesn't want bike lanes on arterial roads like University, Bloor and Jarvis. But apparently he's a big fan of bike lanes all the same, so long as they are only installed where they aren't needed: on cul-de-sacs and quiet residential streets, apparently.
“I’m not only OK with bike lanes, I’m a big fan,” Rossi said. “I do believe in an expanded bike lane network, but we need to do it on a grid basis and we need to use safer routes to travel.”
He’d prefer to have a fact-based discussion about bike lanes rather than a mud-slinging fight, and base it on getting everyone around the city safely and quickly.
Of course, Rossi isn't engaging in some sort of urban planning, based on studies and reason; he's engaging in vote winning and he's willing to say whatever it takes. Rossi is trying to shape the conversation with a "father knows best" approach: "You poor cyclists, why do you want to risk yourselves on the all those fast cars? Those city planners are so irresponsible by trying to put bike lanes there instead of quiet side roads."
Needless to say, Rossi doesn't need to bother investigate just where these side streets are. I'm sure there are plenty of cyclists who would like quiet streets, but they are usually impossible as through routes, or cyclists just need to shop, visit friends, go to work on major arterials. Rossi's solution exists only to appease suburban drivers.
Hume, from the Star:
Rossi, a neo-conservative and former Liberal Party fundraiser, has made no secret of his belief that Toronto will ride to its glorious future on a high-speed multi-lane highway free of bike lanes and walkers.
"I am calling for any further work on this project (Jarvis) to be suspended until the people of Toronto have spoken on Oct. 25," Rossi said this week. It is, he declared, "a clear affront to democracy and to the voters of Toronto."
....Rossi's constituency is made up of people whose lifestyles are threatened by changes ahead, whether that means cutting greenhouse gases or closing a lane of Jarvis. It's okay, Rossi wants them to know, you can carry on as you always have, just bury your head a little deeper in that sand and don't forget to vote for me.
There's nothing new about the politics of middle-class disgruntlement.
This type of politics reminds me of the driver who once angrily yelled at me that he was "a cyclist too", as he proceeded to drive me off the road. My error was in 'taking the lane' as championed by the safe cyclists of CAN-BIKE (and the police, at least officially).*
You're a cyclist? Well, in that case, please feel free to run me off the road with your car. Who needs enemies when you have friends like this?
- Taking the lane, in fact, is often useful, but it can at times draw the ire of drivers. Thus, one might not want to attempt this manoeuvre when one suspects angry drivers nearby.
Comments
David Juliusson (not verified)
Response from Micheal Ignatieff's office on Mr. Rossi's comments
Mon, 03/01/2010 - 11:52I wrote Micheal Ignatieff's office about Mr. Rossi's comments about bike lanes in his Empire Club speech. This is Ignatieff's office official response.
Dear Mr. Juliusson,
On behalf of Michael Ignatieff, I would like to acknowledge receipt of your email regarding Mr. Rocco Rossi’s comments concerning cyclists. As always, your thoughts questions and concerns are very much appreciated.
Mr. Rossi resigned as the National Director for the Liberal Party of Canada in late December to participate as a candidate in the Toronto Mayoral race. The views expressed by Mr. Rossi during his candidacy are his own and do not reflect the policies and opinions of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write the office of Michael Ignatieff and we look forward to hearing from you again in the near future.
Sincerely,
The Office of Michael Ignatieff, M.P.
Leader of the Official Opposition
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Too bad Toronto is out of
Mon, 03/01/2010 - 12:03Too bad Toronto is out of creeks, rivers and rail tracks hide to MUPs visiting nothing beside. Good for recreation though. Just like these things pea brain rossi is doublespeaking about... good for recreation, horrible waste of money if you want to get people using bicycles todo errands and commute.
The Pedaller (not verified)
DOT - Made in the USA
Mon, 03/01/2010 - 12:56While many cities across the US are implementing cycling facilities like bike lanes, we in Toronto look to our elected officials for answers.
In most US cities, the Department of Transportation (DOT) delivers carefully designed, forward thinking solutions to their transportation challenges, but in Toronto, we place our politicians on soap boxes and allow them to pontificate on bike lanes while we wallow in the media hype - how pathetic is that?
Ray (not verified)
Jan Gehl
Sat, 03/06/2010 - 10:38DOT also invited Jan Gehl to help do research on how to make more livable cities.
Wouldn't it be nice if TO would have the guts to have him do an assessment here
I wouldn't mind TO being "copenhagenized"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Gehl
Apparently after the changes that he made in Melbourne, showed an increase of people living in downtown city by 85% in just a few years.
What bothers me is that in TO the majority of the people that vote for who will run this city live in the suburbs and commute by car.
A.R. (not verified)
Accountability in transportation planning
Sun, 03/07/2010 - 03:27Well, would you like it if the MTO rammed through the Spadina Expressway in the 1970s?
anthony
Political Rhetoric
Mon, 03/01/2010 - 16:53What Rocco says about Bike Lanes reminds me of Shakespeare's version of Marc Antony's speech where he says
...I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him...
Really?
locutas_of_spragge
In theory...
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 06:51a number of good candidates for bicycle routes on secondary streets exist in the West end. Unfortunately, they jog at streets like Dufferin, and they have traffic calming features like stop signs at every corner. And they have lane widths that make it impossible to put in bike lanes without removing residential parking (good luck with that!). In other words, Mr. Rossi has made a great proposal that I would love to see the city make work. I would love to have bike routes on minor roads with the traffic calming modified to accommodate cyclists. But having actually worked on these issues in the trenches, I don't believe we can actually do what Mr. Rossi proposes. This means that either Mr. Rossi has people advising him who don't understand the constraints on traffic planning (fail), or else he knows he can't deliver, and wants to get elected by pandering to resentful motorists (epic fail).
I have already decided to support someone other than Mr. Rossi (the bike lane nonsense helped make up my mind).
Goober McFly (not verified)
Supposing
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 08:40Maybe he's the decoy stalking candidate for Smitherman, Rossi makes an angry lone wolf seem like a reasonable alternative.