Google Maps has expanded their bike directions to Canadian cities, following on the heels of Ride the City, which launched their bike directions for Toronto earlier this year. I would have tried it out earlier but was stymied when I navigated to the dot ca domain by mistake instead of maps.google.com.
The bike directions work quite smoothly as we have come to expect from Google. There is a bit of mystery, however, to how they make decisions - presumably they have set their algorithm for the cyclist who will almost always choose the most comfortable route rather than the fastest. The Ride the City map at least provides the option of choosing "safer" or "direct" while creating a route. RTC also displays the bike stores and names the bike paths along the route, which is a nice touch and something that Google could learn to incorporate (this was pointed out by BlogTO which showed how Google just lists the paths as blank names - not particularly user-friendly).
There is also an option to display the bike lanes and bike routes under the More button on the top right. Presumably the green solid lines are bike lanes and bike paths and the dotted green lines are bike routes (with or without sharrows).
The major advantage of these bike direction planners is in planning longer routes through the suburbs where it is often much harder to find direct routes that don't spit the cyclist onto major arterials. BlogTO points out how Google places the cyclist for much too long on Keele - instead of the more comfortable adjacent Caladonia - when creating a route from Christie Pits to York University. In my attempts the exact route can change dramatically given a different starting point of a few blocks. RTC has similar functionality, so it helps to move your points around to test out different options. But no matter what, sooner or later, a cyclist is forced onto a road like Keele - or some other major arterial - in order to cross the 401. This is the nature of our car-obsessed city.
Comments
Darwin O'Connor (not verified)
I tried it on my regular
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:28I tried it on my regular route and it sent me through the PATH, but it did correctly follow the Martin Goodman Trail.
MaryL (not verified)
I tried a Google route from
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:51I tried a Google route from St. Clair and Keele to Bathurst and College, and it sent me along the new West Toronto Railpath (unhelpfully unlabelled, as it looked as if I was just following the train tracks), then onto a short stretch of Dundas at the end, then College all the way. It was a bizarre mix of a super-isolated dedicated path and a really busy street with parking and streetcar tracks.
Meanwhile, RTC's direct, safe and safer routes all matched the choice I made ages ago: along Davenport, south on Christie/Grace, east on Harbord, and south on Bathurst.
The Google bike route beta isn't available on the iPhone yet, but when it shows, I'll have to try it on the road.
(And if you want to cross the 401 out west, it's Jane all the way.)
herb
That seems about right -
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 16:51That seems about right - taking the railpath would be a good option at least while there's no snow.
By the way, RTC has an iPhone app. Has anyone tried it out? What's your perception?
MaryL (not verified)
I can try the railpath route,
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 12:20I can try the railpath route, but I generally find there are too many pedestrians and pleasure cyclists on it to use for a fast commute. My door to door time along the Davenport route is usually 20 minutes on a set of streets that generally give me plenty of room, versus being so crowded on most of College.
The RTC app is $2.99 -- eep! The web site is unusable on Safari, though, so the app is your only mobile choice.