It only took twenty years from when Nancy Smith Lea first asked then-councillor Joe Pantalone to make the Lakeshore/Strachan intersection safer for cyclists, but finally, thanks to the advocacy work of Cycle Toronto's Ward 19 group, we've got a traffic light for northbound cyclists; liberating cyclists from taking the crosswalks in two stages.
This blog post is more about the power of strategic advocacy than about just one traffic light, so I'll be digging into the history of the advocacy around this one, simple improvement to the Lakeshore/Strachan intersection.
Smith Lea, local citizen, director of Toronto Centre for Active Transportation, and fastidious recordkeeper, recounted to me how she had notes about "conversation I had with [Councillor Joe Pantalone] from 1996 where he told me that a new road (Remembrance Drive) had just been approved to provide direct access to Ontario Place and once that was finished they were going to "clean up" the Strachan/Martin Goodman intersection for peds/cyclists. "
Well, that never happened. So ten years later (!), in 2006, Smith Lea sent another email to Pantalone who replied:
Hi Nancy
Thank you for writing to me. I understand and sympathize with the frustration that you are feeling with regards to bike lanes on Strachan Avenue and in the City.Firstly, as part of the Princes' Gates area revitalization, which I led, the area to the east of the Gates was transformed from a "no go" area for pedestrians and bicyclists to an attractive place for both. Furthermore, again as part of this approval, a detailed plan to have dedicated bike lanes all the way to King St West (from Lakeshore) was also approved and I am told by Dan Egan that it will be in place before the end of 2006.
Despite, the above mentioned improvements, the Lakeshore/Strachan Ave/Marting Goodman Trail intersections were not part of this plan and need addressing. The good news is that the Toronto Waterfront Corporation (TWRC) has just completed the rejuvenation of the Trail from Marylin Bell Park going west AND the next section to be done is the section between Ontario Place and Exhibition Place. I am hopeful that TWRC will address the Strachan/Lakeshore intersection so that it will work better for cyclists and pedestrians (by copy of this e mail I am making aware the TWRC'S K Jenkins and Dan Egan, of the points you raise and with which I agree).
For such a low-risk project—one that we can safely assume would elicit zero public outcry and burn zero political capital but at the same time is such a key improvement—it's amazing that nobody at the City made it a priority in twenty years! It would have been such an easy win.
In the end what it took was an advocacy group, Cycle Toronto's Ward 19 advocacy group, and a bike-friendly councillor, Mike Layton to shepherd the proposal through the public works committee and City Council. Only then was it made a priority for transportation planners and made reality.
Three years ago, the Ward 19 group (at the time, I was the ward captain of this great bunch of volunteers) wrote a succinct report on Strachan, detailing six items that we thought should be fixed immediately. Of those six, two have now been addressed—a new traffic light at Strachan and East Liberty and the northbound light at Lakeshore—and one will be addressed when the Railpath phase two is installed: a four-way stop at Douro/Wellington. (The other three involve a southbound light at Queen, and improvements to the bike lanes on Strachan).
The lesson for all of us, I believe, is that the ingredients for getting small improvements to cycling will often require:
- A politician willing to propose and shepherd the project.
- A succinct and understandable proposal that the politician can easily craft into a motion.
- Local support from neighbourhood groups who aren't necessarily cyclists.
- An advocacy group that is willing to doggedly keep at.
- And an increase in population and cyclists putting pressure on the existing substandard infrastructure.
Nancy Smith Lea was definitely determined and, even had the friendly ears of the councillor, but the project failed to have any traction—in my opinion—because neither the councillor nor transportation planners made it a priority. Councillor Pantalone had "hope" that it would be addressed but ultimately didn't shepherd it and left it up to staff to make it a priority (or not). Thus resulting in nothing happening for years and years.
A toast to the determination of Nancy and the other cycling advocates over the years. Cycle Toronto and its ward groups have now picked up the torch and has become better at rallying and organizing for cycling improvements small and large.
Comments
Antony (not verified)
On the pessimistic side,
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 11:28On the pessimistic side, Toronto traffic signals division didn't want to spring for the cost of a properly placed pushbutton post, so look closely and see where they put it.
Want people to stop at the stop line on bikes? Put the crossing pushbutton there! Not Dutch rocket science.
Reporting to 311 now.
herb
Good point Antony. In the
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 12:09Good point Antony.
In the spirit of my post, I'm going to suggest that you'll have more luck if you bring it up with Councillor Layton than with just 311.
W. K. Lis
The black lines one sees at
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 13:14The black lines one sees at traffic signal intersections are the sensors that passively activate the signals. (Unlike the pedestrian push buttons, which are only activated when one activity presses the button.) If there are three white dots, those indicate where a bicyclist can position their bikes to activate the sensors. Unlike other jurisdictions outside of Ontario, where they stencil bicycle symbols instead of dots.
herb
There are no three white
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 13:50There are no three white dots, nor black lines at this stop. The engineers took a shortcut and only installed a push button that's only accessible to pedestrians who can ironically not even cross at the east side because there's no crosswalk.
Aside: those three white dots are emblematic of terrible user interface design. There is nothing in a white dot to suggest that they'll help trigger a light. And there are even places where sitting over the three dots is just an exercise in supreme frustration. Case in point: eastbound on Argyle at Ossington.
Roman Pawlyshyn (not verified)
The new signal is on my
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 13:18The new signal is on my commuting route and I tried it out the other day.
Unfortunately, it isn't set up very logically.
When you press the button going north, the bicycle signal doesn't turn green until after southbound traffic first clears the intersection. That means you're waiting there on your bike on the east side of the intersection -- wondering when or if you'll ever get the bike signal -- while northbound pedestrians are comfortably crossing on the west side. I think many cyclists will still opt to cross with those pedestrians, especially if they're unfamiliar with the signal cycle.
W. K. Lis
The Transportation
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 17:41The Transportation Department/Roads Department would rather keep pedestrians and bicyclists as second class citizens (sorry, taxpayers) in Toronto. Usually it's the ward councillor or neighbouring councillors who initiate bicycle projects, it seems. It looks like some "outsiders" have to ask them to try something. Even then, they usually will not listen.
Nancy Smith Lea (not verified)
Ah Herb, nice way to
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 18:50Ah Herb, nice way to embarrass a person! You're too kind but this is really a story about why Cycle Toronto's ward advocacy program is so critically important. There is strength in numbers that can't be ignored the same way a single citizen, no matter how persistent, can be. Well that, and I saw the report that your team at Ward 19 put together - it was awesome! Nice work!
Lela Gary (not verified)
I ask the question, so that
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 20:38I ask the question, so that I will not repeat myself calling the ever inefficient and warped City mentality to count. Why is the b/lane section inside the park marked with the bike symbol, but not the section on the main thoroughfare, that only has chevrons, that can easily be misinterpreted by drivers?
ALAN WAYNE SCOTT (not verified)
Great work by all to put
Wed, 09/24/2014 - 08:01Great work by all to put these long-awaited changes in place!!!
Despite an imperfect design perhaps, one can only hope it will evolve as inherent flaws become more obvious with non injury/fatality related use. One just hopes that doesn't take another 20 years, eh?
Of course, political will is again the driving force in implementing safer infrastructure for we members of Toronto's second-class citizenry - the non-polluting, non-congesting, actively mobile among us.
Joe Pantalone and Mike Layton may come from the same crowd of outside-influenced partisans, but Joe was a tiny empty suit when it came to cycling. Remember the thousands of folks who marched by his office demanding bike lanes on the western end of College Street for the thousands of cyclists who use that clogged artery daily.
All we got were "sharrows" that apply only during a largely arbitrary rush hour, and they didn't appear for about a decade, until before his anemic mayoral bid in 2010. They are still all that is there.
Elect unaligned local representatives who truly understand urban mobility and watch this great city change!!!
Of course, it will always remain up to us to properly direct them.
Thanks for sharing, Herb!!!