The Bike Writers Collective of Los Angeles came up with a Cyclists' Bill of Rights a few months ago. They claim that cyclists already have all these rights, but they wanted to spell it out. None, I suspect, should be controversial except perhaps the claim that cyclists and their bikes have the right to use mass transit with no limitations. Even during rush hour? On any bus or subway car? A radical idea.
The Bill of Rights has become a rallying cry for different groups in L.A. and now is before city council as a resolution.
WHEREAS, cyclists have the right to ride the streets of our communities and this right is formally articulated in the California Vehicle Code; and
WHEREAS, cyclists are considered to be the “indicator species” of a healthy community; and
WHEREAS, cyclists are both environmental and traffic congestion solutions; and
WHEREAS, cyclists are, first and foremost, people - with all of the rights and privileges that come from being members of this great society; and
NOW, THEREFORE, WE THE CYCLING COMMUNITY, do hereby claim the following rights:
1) Cyclists have the right to travel safely and free of fear.
2) Cyclists have the right to equal access to our public streets and to sufficient and significant road space.
3) Cyclists have the right to the full support of educated law enforcement.
4) Cyclists have the right to the full support of our judicial system and the right to expect that those who endanger, injure or kill cyclists be dealt with to the full extent of the law.
5) Cyclists have the right to routine accommodations in all roadway projects and improvements.
6) Cyclists have the right to urban and roadway planning, development and design that enable and support safe cycling.
7) Cyclists have the right to traffic signals, signage and maintenance standards that enable and support safe cycling.
8) Cyclists have the right to be actively engaged as a constituent group in the organization and administration of our communities.
9) Cyclists have the right to full access for themselves and their bicycles on all mass transit with no limitations.
10) Cyclists have the right to end-of-trip amenities that include safe and secure opportunities to park their bicycles.
11) Cyclists have the right to be secure in their persons and property, and be free from unreasonable search and seizure, as guaranteed by the 4th Amendment.
12) Cyclists have the right to peaceably assemble in the public space, as guaranteed by the 1st Amendment.
And further, we claim and assert these rights by taking to the streets and riding our bicycles, all in an expression of our inalienable right to ride!
Comments
jamesmallon (not verified)
shoe shine!
Thu, 11/27/2008 - 17:20Is what that and $0.50 will get you.
Svend
It's a good idea, our
Thu, 11/27/2008 - 17:57It's a good idea, our rightful place needs to be staked out physically and on paper or they'll be lost. You could substitute "cyclists" with "pedestrians" or just "people" too.
Let's not forget our responsibilities which accompany our rights, we need to respect the space rights of others as well.
Kevin Love
Multi-modal is good
Thu, 11/27/2008 - 21:40If public transit vehicles don't have enough room for bicycles at peak hours, then that is a sign of inadequate public transit.
A good example is the Yonge subway line. Many years ago the Richmond Hill GO line should have been upgraded to an express alternative route. That is proposed for 2015 in the latest plan.
The existing situation of overcrowding was deliberately chosen and is easily (but not cheaply) correctible. In the mean time, lots of money has been spent on car only expressways.
Enci (not verified)
Svend, There is already a
Fri, 11/28/2008 - 12:22Svend,
There is already a pedestrian bill of rights: http://www.feetfirst.info/act/pedbillofrights
As to adding responsibility, I will ask you: Does the United States Bill of Rights have responsibility written in them? Is freedom of safety, freedom to live without fear, freedom of religion, etc. guaranteed only to those who act responsibly? Are motor vehicle operators only guaranteed their rights if they don't run reds, if they stop at stoplights, if they don't use cell phones? Please, read The Bill of Rights! It's called the Bill of Rights for a reason, not The United States of Americas Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.
And as to mass transit, thank you for your comment Kevin. The more people would use mass transit, the more funding public transportation could apply for to help those people who need to bridge the gap on a bike between long distances where there is no mass transit.
Why is it so often assumed that cyclists don't need to go to work during rush hours? Cyclists should be supported by our government in every way! The more cyclists you see, be it on the subway, bus or on the road, the less cars are on the street. The more we accommodate cyclists, the healthier our neighborhoods, our air and our communities will become.
David Juliusson (not verified)
1980's Bike Path through the Harbourfront.
Fri, 11/28/2008 - 15:11Does anyone remember the old bike path through the Harbourfront. It ran from Yonge St. to Bathurst St.
When I first began riding to work i used to take the path. It was under the Gardiner on the south side of the Lakeshore. It had some problems, primarily having to stop and cross some big streets. For the most part, however, it was off road. It disappeared some time in the 1990's.
If you look carefully, it can still be seen along the sidewalk. Originally the sidewalk was half bike and lines were painted. They are a blue green colour.
The cycling community has been looking for years to get a bike lane from the Harbourfront. It is the biggest problem on the Martin Goodman Trail until Scarborough. Why can't we get this path back, even if it is not on the Bike Plan? The two councillors are Councillors McConnell and Vaughan. Both are supportive of bike lanes. It is a stated goal of the Waterfront Trail to have a lane all the way along Lake Ontario. This fills in a gap. I know there are better solutions available, but it has been 15 years. This could be a viable option, at least until the "better " one is ready.
David Juliusson (not verified)
December 8 EA for redesign of Queen's Quay.
Mon, 12/01/2008 - 11:34I received this reply from Councillor McConnell's office . In the meantime, I hope people go to the EA meeting and express your concerns.
Thanks for this message and concern for improved cycling infrastructure in the city. Just as we speak an Environmental Assessment is looking at a redesign of Queen's Quay that would include a dedicated bike path to reconnect the Martin Goodman trail. The process is ongoing, but is considering both dedicated bike lanes next to traffic, and a separated bike path next to a new promenade on the south side of Queen's Quay. You can consult www.waterfrontoronto.ca to get some background information, and as well a public meeting on the latest update for the EA will be held December 8th, 7pm at the Harbourfront Community Centre (open house begins at 6pm). I encourage you to come out to that.
The area under the Lakeshore is not currently planned to return to a bike lane, but we have been working to break down the pedestrian and cycling unfriendly infrastructure that is such a barrier to north south movement across Lakeshore. You'll notice Yonge is undergoing transformation as a promenade, removing a dangerous right hand turning channel. York St has begun similar work. We have approved bike lanes along Yonge between Front and Queen's Quay, and are awaiting a couple of reports that are looking at a traffic light at the Esplanade corner, and possible narrowing of the street for a wider sidewalk. Bike lanes on Bay are being reported on, which would involve reduction of the southbound double right hand turn.
Along Lakeshore in this area the speed limit has been reduced to 50km/hr (signs are being posted shortly), unfriendly guardrails removed, and river rock and landscaping installed. It is possible that we could look at further bike path use along the Lakeshore, but at this point the focus is on the reconnection of the Martin Goodman trail.
geoffrey (not verified)
trail maintenances
Thu, 12/04/2008 - 06:50http://alaskabikeblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/stupidity-rules.html
anthony
City Council “Passes” Cyclists Bill of Rights (in LA, CA)
Wed, 12/10/2008 - 12:35http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/09/city-council-passes-cyclists-bill-o...