UPDATE: This morning the City posted a West End Bikeways Project Summary (6.4MB PDF) in preparation for the meeting. Read on to see what's coming!
I Bike TO has previously reported on the City of Toronto's "West End Bikeways" project. On Tuesday March 10th, there will be a final meeting at 6:30pm at the Parkdale Public Library where the City will present and discuss some of the bikeway projects that they want to implement in 2009 and 2010.
A summary of the project:
The Toronto Bike Plan recommends a Bikeway Network that spans the city, creating a 2 km grid of routes that are accessible within a five minute ride from all residences. The Bike Plan acknowledges that there is a gap in the Network in the downtown west end, where streetcar tracks on east-west arteries, disjointed local streets, and railway corridors all pose challenges to accommodating bikeways.
To address this gap in the Bikeway Network, Transportation Services has partnered with the Toronto Cyclists Union to gather ideas from cyclists on ways to improve cycling conditions in the downtown west end, specifically the area south of Bloor Street, bounded by the Gardiner Expressway, Bathurst Street, and Parkside Drive. The goal of this process is to work with cyclists in the study area to identify short-term bikeway projects that can be built in 2009 and 2010.
It's important to note that this project will focus on simple short-term gains that can be implemented within the next couple of years, not major overhauls of west-end arterial roads like Queen St. Hopefully changes like that can come later. In the meantime, we can focus on getting some contra-flow bike lanes, improved intersection signalling/signage, and route markings, and sharrows to fill in the west-end network.
Even if you missed the Call for Submissions or the previous Open House meeting in the Fall of 2008, this should be a good opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed bikeways. Come to the meeting and push for your own favoured improvements, and comment on any flaws you see in the plans.
The north-south routes in the west end should be easy pickins. Streets like Sorauren, Brock, Palmerston, and others are already pretty good cycling routes, even without special "bikeway" treatment. However, fix up the intersections a bit, add contra-flow lanes, some better signage, and connect it to other routes, and it will all come together as a proper network.
I have also been trying to get the City's bike planners to put some more emphasis on Lansdowne Ave. This minor arterial is already halfway to being a completed bikeway. We have traffic calming and sharrows between Bloor and College, more traffic calming south of the railway all the way to Queen St., and a defacto "bike lane" under the railway bridge where the road narrows to one lane. Pretty soon we should have bike lanes north of Bloor St., connecting to the Dupont/Annette and Davenport bike lanes, plus a connection to the Railpath at College/Dundas. Just need to slap down some more sharrows, put in proper bike lanes under the rail bridge, add some signs, and voila....uninterrupted bikeway from Queen St. to Davenport Rd.
Our former I Bike TO blogger, current editor of Dandyhorse, and west end cycling rabble-rouser Tammy Thorne has sent us a few comments about what's needed in the west-end too. She sees the King / Liberty corridor as the #1 priority for several reasons. This potential bikeway includes sharrows added to an arterial road (King St.), without harming the King streetcar's movement. Also, adding cycling infrastructure through a new development like Liberty Village is a perfect opportunity that should not be missed. It seems that on-street parking has taken precedence over safe cycling through this area so far.
Tammy also suggests that this may be an ideal opportunity for the City to finally install some bike boxes. How about at King / Queen / Roncesvalles to help cyclists make safer turns through this slightly bizarre intersection that is completely chopped up with streetcar tracks?
Anyway, that's enough from us now (and it's time for lunch!). Come out to the meeting if you can, or email your own ideas to bikeplan@toronto.ca.
More information and documents from previous meetings are all of the City's West-End Bikeways website.
Quick summary from the documentation posted this morning:
The following nine projects are proposed for completion in 2009-10:
- Harbord-High Park Connector (signs, sharrows, contra-flow, etc.)
- College Street (Sharrows connecting missing bike lane section)
- Argyle-Robinson (Signed route, contra-flow, improved park connection, etc.)
- King-Liberty (Sharrows, signed route, etc.)
- Sorauren (Signed route)
- Lansdowne Bridge (Bike lanes)
- Brock (Signed route, bike lanes under bridge)
- Shaw (Long contra-flow lane, signed route, etc.)
- Strachan (signed route connecting Trinity-Bellwoods and the bike lanes farther south)
The document also suggests that bike boxes and bicycle actuated signals may be tried.
Have a look, and be sure to come to tonight's meeting if you can.
Comments
tt (not verified)
thanks Vic and hope to see you Tuesday
Mon, 03/09/2009 - 14:23Thanks for the post, Vic.
I hope community members can make it out tomorrow night to give the planners more on-street / site expertise to make this project work as well as it can!
For example, Sorauren is a great n/s but desperately will need to be repaved or patched in the west curb lane if cyclists are to use this as a bikeway.
I'd also like to talk about the Dufferin jog / intersection of Queen/Duff/Gladstone with folks!
See you soon!
tammy@dandyhorse.com
vic
Duff jog, etc.
Mon, 03/09/2009 - 14:49I haven't followed the Dufferin Jog issue much, though I hear there are plans for bike lanes at least on Dufferin St. through there (though how far north/south?). Connection to the Railpath too, if that section of it ever happens. But if they're re-jigging that whole intersection/area, I hope they go a good job of keeping cyclists, pedestrians, and TTC users in mind.
Good point about repaving, etc. too. It really grinds my gears when there is bike infrastructure that is unrideable for various reasons (e.g. Runnymede bike lane).
jamesmallon (not verified)
not what's needed
Mon, 03/09/2009 - 16:10Bikeways do not send the message that the bike is welcome and appropriate on all regular roadways. What we need is the police forced to police driving threatening to cyclists and pedestrians. You know: citizens. Cyclists and pedestrians are not in the way; 100 cubic-foot masses of steel are in the way.
geoffrey
everything is needed
Tue, 03/10/2009 - 07:56James: don't get me wrong, I agree policing of unsafe driving habits and improved education of motorists is vitally important. HOWEVER bikelanes and grade separated paths attract people to bicycling. As these routes proliferate and the perceived safety of cycling improves some of these same threatening and marginally capable motorists actually migrate to bicycles. The beauty of the bike is these same individuals leave smaller craters when they hit things as the force of impact reduces dramatically.
David Juliusson (not verified)
Queens Quay Revitalization Environmental Assessment March 25
Mon, 03/23/2009 - 11:43The Queens Quay Revitalization Environmental Assessment is meeting on March 25 and 28. On the agenda is he completion of the Martin Goodman Trail through central waterfront. The website is www.waterfrontoronto.ca Here is the information from their website.
PUBLIC MEETING & DROP-IN CENTRE Queens Quay Revitalization Environmental Assessment & East Bayfront Transit Environmental Assessment Waterfront Toronto, Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) and the City of Toronto have undertaken comprehensive Environmental Assessments to revitalize Queens Quay from Parliament Street to Lower Spadina Avenue and introduce new transit services to the East Bayfront. The studies have explored how to implement long standing City of Toronto policy objectives to transform Queens Quay into a scenic waterfront drive, provide transit priority and complete the Martin Goodman Trail through the central waterfront. Together, the Queens Quay Revitalization Environmental Assessment and the East Bayfront Transit Environmental Assessment have undertaken the development and analysis of alternatives related to the urban design and functional plan for the overall Queens Quay corridor, and the evaluation of alternative streetcar tunnel and portal locations.
On March 25th Waterfront Toronto will present the recommended preferred road alternative for Queens Quay and the selection of the preferred tunnel portal location for the new streetcar line. The public meeting will include detailed descriptions of the evaluation process and analysis which have led to the preferred alternatives. On March 28th we will be holding a Drop-In Centre where plans of the recommended preferred designs will be on display and team members will be available for one-on-one discussions. PUBLIC MEETING: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 6:30 p.m. (Open House), 7:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. (Public Presentation), Westin Harbour Castle Hotel, Metro West Ballroom, One Harbour Square
DROP-IN CENTRE: Saturday, March 28, 2009, 10:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m., Harbourfront Centre, York Quay Centre, Lakeside Terrace, 235 Queens Quay West
Building
vic
West-End notes posted
Tue, 03/10/2009 - 09:56In case you missed it in the article (scroll up!), the City has posted summary notes for what they hope to install in 2009-10.
hamish (not verified)
the world runs late but should notes be out earlier?
Tue, 03/10/2009 - 15:43Pardon me, I'm often tardy and even delinquent, but does it diminish the utility of the process to have content available only on the day of the meeting?
Svend
Thanks for keeping us updated
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 11:28I've been out of town but I'm very impressed by how these plans are explained and how the consultation process works.
I hope these types of intense bike developments continue in other neighbourhoods soon.
Steven (not verified)
Enthusiastic tone carried through the meeting
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 16:51It was clear that the optimistic enthusiasm expressed in this post and in some of the comments carried through the event. But sharrows don't get me enthused. They are just a reflection of current state, are they not? Please prove me wrong but I fear that they may increase friction between drivers and cyclists, not alleviate it.
Ben W (not verified)
Sharrows: not so bad
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 09:44My gut says that sharrows will become more accepted by drivers and useful for cyclists as they become more ubiquitous. Montreal has a lot of sharrows, and they seem to do fine.
I'm most excited about the idea of sharrows on College, although I think that they'd only be useful during rush hour. There would be cars parked on them during off peak hours.
Ed (not verified)
Will there be plenty of stop signs?
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 20:05I don't see any mention of stop signs in the bikeway summary.
I walked along Argyle St. and there are a four or five stop signs along there. Stop signs and bicycle routes don't really go together.
It's a pain to stop and restart.
Most bicyclists don't stop, and many don't even slow down: the fast cyclists are of course "training", while the slow pseudo-pedestrian cyclists don't think that vehicle rules apply to them.
Traffic lights controlled by bicycles likely means a stop and pause at each traffic light. Plus the "does it detect me?" wait.
Antony (not verified)
Stop signs on bike routes
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 22:11Vancouver's approach to intersections on bike routes is to put curb islands in the center, making a mini roundabout. Stop signs are put on the non-bike route roads. This keeps drivers at a reasonable speed, and gives bikes right-of-way.
Of course, Vancouver doesn't have snow, or snowplows.
Tom Flaherty
Rollin, Rollin, Rollin.....
Sat, 03/14/2009 - 02:25I yield at stop signs, slow at 3 ways lights and stop at 4 way lights; but I AM very cautious.
Some states, like Idaho have even passed laws permitting cyclists to yeild (not stop) at stop signs.
There are safety studies that support this decision, but implementation depends on how forward thinking the particular area is.
http://www.oregoncycling.org/2008/12/are-we-ready-for-an-idaho-style-bic...
Kevin Love
Meeting report
Wed, 03/18/2009 - 22:49I was there.
The major problem with the meeting was that the major routes (eg Bloor) were excluded from consideration. However, within its reduced mandate, there were some very positive initiatives. In no particular order, these are:
A. Bike boxes. It would be great to get bike box construction started in Toronto.
B. New bike lanes. Particularly contra-flow lanes. The problem is that the lanes proposed are not real Copenhagen-style bike lanes with concrete barriers keeping the cars out. The reality is that a bike lane full of parked cars which the Toronto Police refuse to tow away is worse than useless. It is a positive hazard. It is also destructive of social order to have a police force that refuses to uphold and enforce the law. Also a serious hazard is a bike lane which is mostly in car door zones. For a look at some real bike lanes, see:
http://www.copenhagenize.com/2008/06/copenhagen-lanes-celebrate-25-years...
C. Links with the Railpath. If the southern portion of this path actually happens, this will be a valuable facility. Like the 401 is for cars, this will be a limited-access express bicycle route. Just like the 401, providing on and off ramps for links with local streets is an issue.
Unfortunately, there were some local issues that were not considered. One of them was bike parking. Literally not on the map. Another was converting four-way stop signs to two-way on bicycle routes. Another was clearing snow from bike paths.
Overall impression: It was good, but it could have been better.
geoffrey
Idaho stop in Oregon: media motorholics have conniption
Thu, 03/19/2009 - 13:26http://bikeportland.org/2009/03/18/the-oregonian-takes-low-blow-at-idaho...
The CAA would have Rob Ford frothing at the mouth at the very mention of this being considered. Nice lap dog. Down lap dog.