I got an email from the Mayor this morning (as did James at Urban Country). Mayor Miller isn't abandoning public bikes and is directing staff to look for other funding options. He mentions Bikeshare, which was run by the Community Bicycle Network and had a hard time getting enough funding from the city to sustain itself too:
Thank you for your email letter.
We appreciate you taking the time to write.
Until 2006 Toronto was home to the innovative and award-winning Bikeshare community bicycle-lending program. Following its collapse the City began developing a business case for a public bike program.
The City considered launching such a program using the Vienna business model (which is also used in Lyons and Paris) where it is provided free to the City and affordable to users because it is supported by revenue from billboards on the bike stations. After much deliberation it was decided not to increase the number of billboards on the street and launched a competitive process to find a company to provide a non-ad-supported version.
A public tender was issued and City Council gave staff authority to negotiate with BIXI, which is owned by the Montreal municipal parking authority, to develop a detailed business plan for launching and operating a Toronto public bicycle system at no cost to the City. Unfortunately, the outcome of these negotiations did not guarantee that there was no risk of costs being incurred.
A public bike program in Toronto is not being abandoned. It remains an integral part of our sustainable transportation plan. The Mayor has instructed City Staff to review the viability of this type of program with other funding options.
I hope the Mayor pushes staff a bit to look outside the box. It's going to save us money soon enough in health care costs, road maintenance, insurance.
The Star also reports that talks have stalled but that the City is still optimistic.
“I’m optimistic there will be a public bike-share program in the foreseeable future,” he said.
A report on the idea to the city’s works committee was scrubbed from the March 2 agenda, raising concerns the deal was dead. It’s not, Welsh said, but he couldn’t guarantee a Montreal-style bike rental system would be available in downtown Toronto by the summer as originally planned.
With an election looming, cycling activists fear that if current negotiations fail with Bixi, Montreal’s public bike system company, a new council might not pursue the idea.
“Now is the window to get it done,” said Yvonne Bambrick, executive director of the Toronto Cyclists Union.
“Having a public bike share program will change the face of Toronto for the better. I’ve seen how it’s been taken up in Montreal and in France. There’s some major benefits all around and I really wanted to see those benefits play out on the streets of Toronto,” she said.
Bixi has signed on to begin new bike-share systems in Minneapolis and Melbourne, Australia, this year, but Toronto still doesn’t have a deal.
The snag is over who pays for the program’s start-up cost of $10 million to $11 million. In some cities, the municipality pays for the bikes and stations, and sometimes advertising can cover the costs.
Comments
Martin Reis (not verified)
I think it's high time for
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:39I think it's high time for the Province to do something for cycling, anything. If that fails, I think the city can use some of the cash it wastes on NOT completing the bike plan (scam) and pay for the bike lending program itself. That is to say, since the city is lagging far behind in bike lane installations I suspect (and it would not be the first time) that the funds allocated to the bike plan are being wasted ... I strongly suspect the city has the cash but is afraid to pay for it fearing a public backlash... We are so screwed.
jamesmallon (not verified)
Bike Plan Scam
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:42I am with 'Martin' on this. The city should pay for both a bike plan (not the one we have, though) and bikeshare, but the province, and police force, have stolen too much from the city for the money to be there for both. If you have to fund one, fund the bikeshare. It will put more bikes on the streets downtown, than anything else. Yes, it'd be nice to fund cycling in the suburbs, but until we lower suburban arterial road speeds, you are not going to get Joe and Jane two-car-garage to play in 80km/h traffic (60 limit, plus 20 over average). Once we have a cycling core, it can spread outwards. I'm sorry if you live in N. York or Scarborough, but it ain't going to spread outwards from there!
A cycling core will spread outwards, challenge the assumptions of autohead politicians and police, and demand a rethinking of traffic laws, road speeds, and the current asinine road standards in the bikeplan. They are a year or two ahead in Montreal because of Bixi. Let's shape up. I am tired of regretting returning to Toronto from Montreal, and also Tokyo.
James (not verified)
Federal tax incentive
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:37I wish the federal government would offer a tax incentive for people to commute by bicycle. They already do it for public transit after all.
I understand it would be difficult to audit, but that could be a great way to get people thinking about cycling instead of driving or taking public transit.
Goober McFly (not verified)
We're free!
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:59I don't need or expect a tax incentive to ride, we should be proud to be the only non-subsidized form of transportation.
Fiscal conservatives should be patting us on the back, but I don't expect that either.
Tom Flaherty
Cycling for Dummies
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 12:31Perhaps we could create a short list of the benefits of cycling designed to appeal to the average driver:
Yvonne (not verified)
Great List Tom!
Thu, 02/25/2010 - 13:48I love this list Tom, but I'd like to suggest a slight edit to your 5th point that could be misinterpreted by some.
5. Do not contribute to road repair
Rather than potentially perpetuating the myth that cyclists who don't pay various vehicle fees are not paying for our roads, I think we could change this to...
*5. Do not contribute to long term road damage *
Or something along those lines...
As many of us know, anyone who pays rent or property tax contributes equally to the costs of municipal road maintenance :)
Tom Flaherty
along those lines
Thu, 02/25/2010 - 22:24OK - 5. Do not contribute to road wear
Thanks Yvonne.
Anybody know what Toronto spends on road repair per year?
Matias Marin (not verified)
In 2007 we intended to spend
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 09:45In 2007 we intended to spend 230 million dollars, which was 10 million more than 2006 on road repair...Im still looking for the exact 09 number.
-Matias
http://cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20070417/road_construction_0704...
Thats an article that references the 2007 numbers. Im sure once I look in the approved 09 budget I will find the numbers.
brian
Education Benefits
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 11:03Hey Tom, Yvonne,
Some cycling education benefits:
Cycling education:
More specifically, cycling education
a) teaches people how to use the vehicles they're operating
- how brakes work, how gears work, how tires work, etc.
b) breaks down common misconceptions
c) enables knowledge sharing and learning
d) addresses gaps in instruction that automobile driver training dosn't cover
e) equips people with skills that are proven and accepted
Glad to contribute!
Anyone else have cycling benefits they'd like to share?
Cheers,
Brian
Tom Flaherty
Auto Motive
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 12:26Good points Brian.
I understand the benefits of cycling are many, but I want to create a list that is made with the wants & needs of drivers alone. The list should ideally be seen as selfish and biased of course, but effective in countering the simple rhetoric of how cycling has a "bad" effect on car use in Toronto.