It has been well over two days since Toronto cyclists woke up to a shattered dream: the dream of a pilot bike lane project on University Avenue. No, it wasn't the right-wing bike hating extreme that put it down, but a bike lane loving councilor that blamed it on technology, or lack of sleep, or perhaps it was memories of communist day camps in the wilds of Manitoba, but regardless, Paula "fat fingers" Fletcher was the one to blame.
But if you looked on the Toronto Star website and read the story, or maybe the comments, you would think that Yahweh himself had come down and grabbed her hand and put it on the big red no button.
It was divine intervention, chimed in more than one of the many people who read the Star, comment on how crappy life is in Toronto, but don't really live here (those people who see fit to tell people who actually live here what they are supposed to think and how much Toronto sucks and everything else).
It seemed that every other member of the peanut gallery was going on how ambulances used University to get to the hospitals and how cyclists would slow them down and how putting a bike lane on University would cause the death of millions.
Well, I agree totally. If bike lanes on University are going to be the cause of untold deaths, then we should have no bike lanes on University. In fact, we should clear all traffic off of those most important of lanes because if bike lanes were going to slow down ambulances I can just think how slow traffic gets during rush hour with lanes and lanes of car traffic. How many more deaths are caused by rush hour?
So let us take all traffic from University Avenue and use it for an emergency vehicle access point so ambulances, fire trucks and the police can get faster from point A to point Z. For once I actually can get behind one of those commenter's asinine ideas.
Comments
Seymore Bikes
Critical Condition
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 01:10The reality of University Ave. is that it is a bloated roadway that caters to drivers. As such, I think that City Council would have had more success with bowling lanes than Bike Lanes.
As well intentioned as they were, the idea of separated bike lanes on University Ave. did not stimulate a feeling of discovery of what was possible, instead it essentially flicked drivers in their proverbial noses. The majority of Torontonians would rather stomp out any notion that a vehicle lane be borrowed for several weeks for a Pilot Project for cycling infrastructure, because we love the ass cuddling that happens when we are strapped into the driver’s seat.
If cyclists think for one second that they are going to be permitted to jeaporidize the pursuit of blissful solitude that exists while idling alone in one’s car, then think again. Drivers are directing the public policy of this city, and until we get people to realize the benefits of cycling, people will stick to what they already know. If it takes 70 minutes to get from Markham to downtown then so be it! Because my I-pod, cell phone and Tim Horton’s breakfast sandwich are the best part of my day!
Phil (not verified)
What gets me...
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 01:36...outside of tight bike shorts, is the rationality of some of Toronto drivers, regardless of where they are from. Their only solution to downtown traffic congestion...is to bring more cars downtown. Decades of congestion, and they can't seem to get it that it's the cars that are doing it. Too many downtown.
To take a position behind them, I wouldn't want to ride the TTC either.
Phil (not verified)
Furthermore...
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 01:46Actually, I'd like to comment on that great pic of 4 cops on bikes (cobs?) going the wrong way in a bike lane (not sure if it loads the same for everyone).
Even cops demonstrate in this picture that stuff like this is appropriate in the mindset of a cyclist. If there were no traffic on that street, something like this would be right in line with the recent Netherlands cycling "rush hour" videos. I've done this in my decades of biking in this City. I know it's illegal, but I do it, because I think it makes sense.
IH8bikes (not verified)
Further idiocy
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 06:26Of course you do it even though it's against the law...because just like the cretinous A..holes on council who support the lunatic fringe, you know which laws need to be respected and which do not, because you are among the self-appointed liberal elite who know what is best for everyone, if only the rest of us would just realize how enlightened you are. How frustrating it must be for an intellectual collossus like yourself to have to endure the inane miasma that flows freely from the neanderthals clad in their motorized exoskeletons. You just go ahead and break whatever laws you like because you clearly possess an almost supernatural ability to discern right from wrong.
geoffrey
WE ARE THE BIKEBORG ..
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 14:07YOU WILL BE ASTIMULATED
IH8bikes will henceforth be known as Cleatus, spinner of Raleigh.
But seriously H8er, if you were really opposed to bicycling you wouldn't be here. You REALLY WANT to bicycle don't you?
You are a little afraid. Aren't you? Maybe you are nervous you will look silly the first few times. Not to worry.
H8er, there are CANBIKE courses available for people just like you. The instructors are patient and will have you comfortable on your trusty steel steed faster than you can say Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong. Ok, maybe not quite that fast but you get my drift.
H8er I wish you many happy long and fulfilling rides. After all bicycling is an enjoyable mode of transport when the threat of inattentive and dangerous motorists is minimised.
4 season cyclist (not verified)
Re: further idiocy
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 13:30Yes it's like the 93% of drivers who routinely roll through stop signs. Or if they do stop, they block the crosswalk. The difference is the motorist is risking the lives of other people's children; the cyclist mostly just his own.
Though to be fair many motorists don't understand what they're doing is illegal or even know where they're supposed to stop, nor do they understand that two seconds of their own lives is not worth as much as someone else's entire future.
If they took the trouble to remember what they had to know for their driving exam then thousands of innocent lives could be saved every year. But that's an awful lot of bother. And it's a nuisance caring about some stranger's life, or how their family will be devastated if something goes wrong because of their indifferent driving. Especially when they're trying to shave 2 minutes off their trip.
It's OK to H8 bikes; just don't ride one and don't hate cyclists and you'll be fine.
btw I always travel the right direction and stop properly whether on a bike or behind the wheel. And I only ever exceed the speed limit on my bicycle. But the darned cops won't give me a ticket.
zhou (not verified)
Cops
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 09:36Oh, I had another favourite %$#head 905 resident cop moment yesterday. I passed on the left of one jerk in a rush-hour no stopping zone, during rush-hour; half a block later I passed another. Who was in the middle of the two? No word of a lie, a cop pulled over eating a doughnut. ^%$%%^ *&&&%!!!
hamish (not verified)
great! pic; and there's a subway under UA
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 10:27fabulous picture - and I really should try harder to share more pics myself....
With University Ave., one thing that tends to be ignored in the discussion is that there is a big subway underneath Univeristy Ave, so that people who want to go fast, or who might think they are a bit constrained for a bike lane, well, maybe take the subway as an option?!
Maybe that's too logical a concept to squeeze cars a bit alongside or above a subway - but odds are it's done in Yurop eh?
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Toronto is stuck in 1970 or thereabouts
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 13:14that is when it reached it's carrying capacity for cars.
Until then expect taxes to rise, city services to dwindle and infrastructure to erode.. you can't have the density(tax income) required to move forward until you can accommodate more people getting around the city... in short, gridlock in the end really could strangle Toronto's income. Next time an option appears to put in a bike-lane or something to increase density and use of the roads Toronto city council should drop trough and say YES!!
Toronto is too scared to take the next step, and it is becoming a huge problem. I find it funny in a sadistic/masochistic way.
vélotect (not verified)
rolling through
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 14:49As a cyclist, I hate cyclists who ride through red lights, they seem to think they'll never run into another cyclist. Breaking the road laws for convenience, whether in a car or on a bike is selfish idiocy.
Having commuted in London, U.K. on a bike, I found the added infrastructure for cyclists at lights made the motorist cyclist relationship much more amenable to both parties, particularly for left hand turns. If entire grade separated lanes are too psychologically imposing for motorist commuters, then maybe we can settle on improved intersection markings and infrastructure.
I still think the real solution lies in planning of another scale of magnitude, the suburbs need to build properly scaled business cores and allow for some higher density developments near those cores. Toronto won't survive if it continues to be a city about the edge and the centre, it needs to become a polycentric city. This will reduce commutes more than anything.
James (not verified)
An outsider perspective
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 21:23As someone who is visiting China right now, I find it amusing how much we complain in Canada about EVERYTHING. Here in China, the only vehicles that are required to stop at red lights are cars. Motorcycles, bicycles, scooters and the like, are allowed to proceed.
People on the roads here don't complain about anything, and there is no such thing as road rage here. In fact, there is no such thing as being rude here either. The roads here are like a river flowing - it just keeps flowing, and you just make your way through it.
When people honk here, it is just to let the person know to watch out - nobody ever gets angry - even if someone appears to blatently cut someone off. When someone on a motorcycle rides the wrong way on the road, people will beep but nobody will get upset.
And I love cycling here too because cars drive slower and give you lots of space when they pass. Yes, cars do have the right of way, and you need to do your best to stay out of their way, but they won't run you over if you are in the way - you'll just get a beep to warn you that they are coming.
I haven't had any drivers come close to the brushes that I get in Toronto very frequently at high speeds - especially during Toronto's rush hour when Queen/King/Dundas have all 4 lanes in operation.
I think we can all take a page from the Chinese culture and just relax a little and stop being so uptight about everything.
Bradley Wentworth (not verified)
Agree with James and Velotect
Sat, 05/15/2010 - 22:47I too have seen bike cops going the wrong way in a bike lane, but they were covering a protest in front of CAMH at Spadina and College. I don't mind if there are bike cops anywhere; suddenly drivers are a lot more tame around me :)
Good comparisons with the UK and China. To be honest, the letter of the law is not what guides my behaviour on my bicycle; statistics, ie, most dangerous and fatal crashes, and experience guide how I ride. I have written here before about how out-of-date the Highway Traffic Act is, for instance. I am also tireless in insisting to all my friends who bike that they should never, ever cycle on the sidewalk. Statistically, it's a death trap; cars just don't see you at intersections and driveways.
Seymore Bikes
Road Apples
Sun, 05/16/2010 - 00:00If it were up to me there would be a lot more Police on bikes, but the most I have seen were at a Critical Mass ride; so many in fact, that one even crashed into a cyclist knocking him to the ground.
I wonder how many more Police could patrol by bike if we decided to swap them for the ones on Horses?
Drivers can complain all they want about cyclists, but we’re not dropping piles of crap on the road.
Dorph1 (not verified)
University Avenue is fine the way it is.
Sun, 05/16/2010 - 20:54For me anyway. Sure I'd like to see a dedicated bike lane on University if it meant more cyclists, but for a cyclist who rides like a car? Not so good. University is a wide, sweeping, fast road. It is fun to ride. A dedicated bike lane would force me into it. Maybe a minor point in the grande scheme of a more bikeable Toronto, but the goal should really be better bicycle drivers in general.
One of the main problems I see is seemingly local cyclists who have no idea how intersections work in the city. At a stoplight: see that dotted line on the pavement on the left side of the bike lane? That means right turning cars are allowed to use the lane if it's clear. How many times have I been sitting behind the turning car and watched bike riders get all upset, start ringing their bells and do that one-foot-on-the-curb scooter push to get to their precious pole position, which they squander with a weak start??
For me the best streets to ride on have no bike lanes. Downtown that means University south from Bloor to the lake, Bloor between Spadina and Bathurst, all of Yonge street, Richmond, Adelaide, Queen.
...and that photo of the police going the wrong way up the bike lane? C'mon guy. Everybody does that all the time. Would you rather the police take the long way 'round to the crime scenes??