Warning: this video is graphic in its portrayal of the "war on cars".
If only these drivers were licensed! Oh wait. I can't believe just how many of the red light runners aren't slowing down at all. See scary, graphic video
Warning: this video is graphic in its portrayal of the "war on cars".
If only these drivers were licensed! Oh wait. I can't believe just how many of the red light runners aren't slowing down at all. See scary, graphic video
Comments
kiwano
I've always wondered, if it's
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 14:25I've always wondered, if it's a war on cars, how come the casualties are all pedestrians and cyclists (and friendly fire between the cars)?
Ben
Because when people say "war
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 15:58Because when people say "war on car," what they really mean is that they don't want congestion to be addressed in ways that other than leveling neighbourhoods to put in new expressways. The war analogy is just hyperbole.
silvio (not verified)
I don't have the stats but I
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 21:04I don't have the stats but I suspect many more drivers are killed each year in accidents than cyclist and pedestrians combined. If there is a war on the car it looks more like a civil war.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Not gonna watch the snuff
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 23:16Not gonna watch the snuff video.
It certainly looks tragic enough and God knows this fate could befall any of us on two wheels.
Jacob L.
Looks like that motorcyclist
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 23:53Looks like that motorcyclist at the end survived.
simplicius2wheels
Thanks for posting that
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 11:30Thanks for posting that video. After watching it, one has the urge to look left and right before entering an intersection - regardless off whether one has the green light or not, and also regardless whether sitting at the wheel of a car or (much more vulnerable) while pedalling a bike...
junc-head (not verified)
Re: Dances, Silvio and
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 08:22Re: Dances, Silvio and Simplicius
Re Dances: Totally. Every time I pass some sorry piece of roadkill--and I used to bike Mississauga, so that was often--I can't help but feel some empathy...that might be any one of us someday, and our death will mean approximately the same as the squirrel's.
Re Silvio: My girlfriend was recently rear-ended, and I saw the vehicular homicide stats for the past few years posted while I was with her at the Collision Reporting Centre. Autos and Pedestrians were appx. equal at around 35-50 deaths per year, while cyclists were much lower, generally 1-4.
Re Simplicius: Totally agree. I ring my bell twice before entering any controlled intersection, and after the video and your comment, my head's gonna be on a swivel like that girl from the Exorcist.
Thanks for posting.
Seymore Bikes
The 'War on the Car' is
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 00:33The 'War on the Car' is simple rhetoric that gets applied to anything that does not advance the needs of drivers, like: bike lanes, vehicle registration tax, street cars, parking tickets, gas tax, drive clean, hov lanes, etc. It also divides our transportation policies as being either for or against cars, instead of providing balanced solutions that work for all.
A twisting of the truth, intended to fit the frustrations of drivers; it may also keep people from developing a better understanding of our transportation problems and possible solutions.
Toronto has managed to rank as one of the worst cities in the world for commute times, yet it remains stuck in reverse when it comes to doing anything about it.
Bottom line, money talks and implementing transit solutions already working in other cities gets buried in slander. The re-direction of money currently being spent on cars and fuel is what is truly at issue when it comes to the 'War on the Car', like all wars, it's all about financial gain.
silvio (not verified)
Improving traffic light
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 08:43Improving traffic light synchonization is a solution that works for all and one I hope get more funding.
Running streetcars down the middle of arterial roads is good for transit but not so good for pedestrians, bikes, cars, and local businesses so I hope we don't get more of that "solution".
herb
Sounds like your agenda,
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 11:03Sounds like your agenda, Silvio, is to get rid of streetcars and you don't care what the topic is, you'll find a way to push your agenda.
Your "traffic light synchronization" is just some optimistic drivel you got from some pro-car campaign site. It's simplistic and unjust to assume that everything has to be optimized for automobile traffic. It just means that everyone on transit, foot or bike has to wait for car traffic. If anything traffic lights should be optimized for cyclists (like they've done in Copenhagen and elsewhere).
Finally, if anything making it more comfortable for drivers to go fast and to get lulled into a false sense of safety and security is exactly the problem here. If anything there should be more psychological and physical barriers put in the way to create a sense of danger for drivers so they slow down and pay attention to their surroundings again. You should read Tom Vander Bilt's book "Traffic" to understand the perverse, counter-intuitive effects of trying to make things "safer" for drivers that instead make things much more dangerous for everyone.
Silvio (not verified)
Herb, I don't have an agenda.
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 15:59Herb, I don't have an agenda. I'm just expressing an opinion.
It's not clear to me why you choose to misread and /or misrepresent my comments. Wouldn't it better to just stick to opinions without the intellectual dishonesty? I never said anything about improving synchronization for the benefit of automobiles. Seymour suggested changes should benefit all and I commented that improving the traffic light sychronization would be a good idea. Cycling at 25-30 km/h means one must stop every other block on most main streets which is no fun at all. That is my real "agenda" if you feel you must assign a motive to every comment on this forum.
You claim synchronizing is a bad idea then state that "optimizing" traffic lights is a good idea. Perhaps you can explain the difference. You should also reasearch the SCOOT traffic management system before spewing more paranoid claims about the pro-car campaigns and traffic lights. You might be excited to learn SCOOT provides priority to transit and reduces vehicle pollution.
You incorrectly suggest I want drivers to go fast. I don't want them to go any faster than the speed limit and the road conditions permit.
Finally, have no agenda to rid Toronto of streetcars but I don't like them. Toronto can keep the streetcars but I don't want anymore built down the middle of arterial roads. It's bad for bikes, pedestrians, businesses and vehicular traffic other than streetcars. So that you don't misrepresent this comment I'm most concerned about police, ambulance and fire department vehicles.
Copenhagen is a great city and Toronto can learn from them. Copenhagen scrapped their Tramway system (streetcars) and replaced it with subways and trains. Go figure.
W. K. Lis (not verified)
Some parents have an
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 13:24Some parents have an unfounded sense of security when they drive their kids to school, sports, etc. saying it would be safer for their kids. Unfortunately, the opposite is true. More children are killed being driven to school by their parents than transit, bicycle, walking, or school bus.
A.R. (not verified)
Can't we just let the stupid
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 13:39Can't we just let the stupid "war on cars" rhetoric die? It's just extreme hyperbole.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
The automobile's war on
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 14:38The automobile's war on people continues
simplicius2wheels
Here's the text that's part
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 14:50Here's the text that's part of that image's "properties" data:
Fireroads (not verified)
Of course they don't slow
Mon, 12/06/2010 - 09:39Of course they don't slow down.
Note that most of the video is filmed at prime accident locations. Heavily used, over-developed FM roads that sport long stretches of open highway driving between intersections that were never intended as 4-way stops.
They are not seen to slow down because they do not intend to run the red light. But for a few exceptions they are not aware of the presence of the intersection until near entering or at/after collision.
Silvio, you totally have an agenda, you want bus transit.
You may say differently but with no money for subways or replacement, separated LRT networks and nothing on either horizon when you state your desire to see streetcars abandoned you are proclaiming your desire to see it replaced with a bus system. Likewise when you say no additional streetcars you are proclaiming for additional buses.
Streetcars are far better for bikes and pedestrians than buses. For a driver or biker responsible enough to drive to conditions rather than trying to force conditions as impatient drivers or bikers do, streetcars are much better than buses.
As for syncro lights that presumably allow for non-stop driving in the city, it doesn't work without serious costs. One of those costs is driver tendancy to trust signals.
"Trust signals" is a fallacy. For one thing, a driver may trust that the signal will change in accordance with it's program but what they are actually trusting is their own ability to control their own progress in relation to the signal's timing. That is where the accidents occur.
You also see drivers engaging in risky behaviour in order to try and benefit by the syncro system. This includes super accelerating / hard braking to positions in traffic they believe beneficial. Also includes a notorious accident situation, drivers that "ride the wave". These often strike, or are struck by, driver that are trying to catch the wave at intersections.
As for timed lights and cycling, this is not France and you are not Lance Armstrong. Most city cyclists rarely or barely ever achieve 25-30 kph. A much smaller, infinitely small, number actually sustain such a speed. Only a foolish city would take these few cyclists into account. If you want to race, get on a track. If you want to train, get on a highway. If you want to do either in the city, stop at every light. It will improve your sprinting ability. If you want to talk about accommodating your training rides in the city with dreams of any system that would do it, find someone with an interest in your hobby and stop buggin people whose interest is transportation.
In reality such systems are really only very efficient in new cities with clearly established grids, a dearth of intersecting neighbourhood streets and no functional street level mass transit. Even in such an ideal circumstance as a Souther US city he accident rates lurch sharply with every perceived decline in gridlock.
Programmed signals can be beneficial, obviously, since they are all programmed in some manner and without them intersections would be murder. But Silvio's suggestion to utilize signals to make things easier for a few dozen guys on the weekends is crazy talk. He seems like a guy that is irritated that he has to slow down or even stop to let people off of a streetcar.
Ed
Synchronizing lights only
Mon, 12/06/2010 - 10:55Synchronizing lights only works if
This actually takes place on Adelaide and Richmond, at least in off hours. Most city streets have strong bi-directional flow: which direction do you optimize for? And do you prioritize University or Queen? Finally, when there's more traffic than can get through one green cycle, the synchronizing breaks down.
On the other hand, I guess I'm infinitely small, seeing as I routinely run up to 30 km/h between lights, and will go to 35+ in a sprint to make a light or get past a streetcar. Even mild downhills such as Queen by Trinity-Bellwoods is good for high speeds. Back when I was using it regularly, I wished that Sherbourne was synchronized southbound--it's easy enough to do 40 km/h (the legal limit, don't'cha know) southbound. More to the point, it's worth the effort to get up to that speed and maintain it if you can hit all green lights. (Oh, and no car right-hooks you....and no pedestrian steps out into the bike lane....and if no poor pavement patch doesn't send you flying....)
Fireroads (not verified)
True, In Toronto's core most
Mon, 12/06/2010 - 11:22True, In Toronto's core most cyclists maintain somewhere between 10-15 kph.