It's time again for the annual article on tips for winter cycling in one of the mainstream newspapers and once again they go over the top in trying to provide the definitive guide to provide security against every contingency. I admire their earnest attempt to give some advice for those brave souls, but ends up with making the result look more like an astronaut on a wintery moon launch. To be fair last year the Star reported that the key thing for winter cycling are tissues, but this was only because Yvonne had tried to convince them winter cycling is easy:
But do we really need to start training for NASA to get through the winter? My proposal: think about what you'd wear if you were going for a long winter walk and wear it:
©P1040788.JPG
Look: warm clothes! Practical, but not particularly fashionable. (Photo by Tino)
©never too old, never too cold
This guy has a smart-looking, warm hat. (Photo by Xander)
Every Canadian knows the drill: warm jacket, mitts, boots, long underwear and toque. The only thing I would add as important are lights for the bike. That's it.
Or you can even try to be fashionable (from Xander) though it would be hard to wear long johns under tight jeans:
©IMG_2102 i'm not cold, i'm Fryslan
To be sure there are more things that can go wrong with your bike in the winter, so take a note of the article's advice on keeping your bike functioning and riding safely. In sum, no quick turning or stopping. Keep your chain well oiled.
Comments
Seymore Bikes
I agree with the Star's
Thu, 12/16/2010 - 20:47I agree with the Star's suggestion on what to wear: water proof, wind proof, thermal. The 9 extra articles (including face protection) I fashion during snow months ensure I get where I want in relative comfort regardless of slush splatter, driving snow or -25C wind chill.
Plus the obvious pre-requisite lights & fenders are an absolute must; a brown stripe up your back is a warning sign to others that says "I'm not ready"
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Well, let me say that under
Thu, 12/16/2010 - 18:33Well, let me say that under Jens factor HC, a spacesuit is required apparel.
Honestly herb, i have seen a lot of people with slush on their face, slush up their back and looking slightly hypothermic under their designer wool petty-coat. Sometimes there really is a scenario where a bit of the correct gear(you don't have to buy all of it but do get the button) will do you good and this article seems to point people towards what will help them to feel comfortable - even if it isn't your personal fashion choice - the gear works. Dress how you want, if you want to make a little chart about which wool-petty coat and scarf you need to wear go ahead, i won't laugh - be sure to take extra tissues because something will have to stop the wind from howling in after you ditch the wind-proof.
Style over speed, but now style over substance or did those things go together!
Kevin (not verified)
Most trips in Toronto are for
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 07:31Most trips in Toronto are for less than 2 km, so the space suit is really not necessary. For long, long trips, yes the "reverse strip-tease" is necessary if it is crappy outside. But the same clothing is necessary for ANY long time outside outside. For example, spending two hours outside with my children for the Santa Claus Parade required even warmer clothing than the same amount of time cycling because I wasn't moving and generating heat.
Most of the other things are needed 365 days of the year. Even in August lights are a must if riding after dark. And anyone foolish enough to ride without fenders when the roads are wet after a rain in June is going to get covered with filth. Good quality bikes should come from the factory with things like lights, fenders and a chaincase as standard equipment.
Kevin Love
Random cyclist (not verified)
Hilarious. But not as funny
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 08:10Hilarious.
But not as funny as seeing the fashionista hipster parade in the laundromat the next day trying to figure out what the best way to remove salt stains from their $300 jeans is.
Random cyclist (not verified)
Hilarious. But not as funny
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 08:11Hilarious.
But not as funny as watching the fashionista hipster parade trying to figure out how to remove salt stains from their $300 jeans.
Ed
Clothing suitable for riding
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 08:53Clothing suitable for riding a bicycle in winter is hardly clothing suitable for sitting around for two hours watching the Santa Claus parade.
I want my bicycle clothes to give me good freedom of motion, be reasonably windproof, be able to change layers as circumstances demand, and be something that I can throw into the washing machine after it gets all splattered with road crud. The getups in the pictures fail on one or more counts.
(I don't see how I would get those knee-high boots into toe clips....nor how I could maintain a cadence of more than 40 if I somehow succeeded.)
For under two kilometres, why not just walk? Won't take much longer, won't turn your chain into rust, and you have at least some chance of not being turned into a salt-slurpee-popsicle.
Eugenics doesn'... (not verified)
Clothing that is suitable for
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 11:21Clothing that is suitable for cycling in winter can also be used to sit around in the cold watching the Santa Parade.
Just adapt to actual conditions. Instead of riding in such a manner that you are certain to need breathable, thin clothing that does not insulate well, ride to conditions that include your preferences off the bike. Not just the demands of a futile attempt to ride the same cadence/manner that you do in other seasons.
Slow down, plan your trips, ride a city bike, use fenders & chain guards. With appropriate gear, whatever you would wear walking is what you can wear riding.
Look to the Dutch, and stop dreaming of being Lance on every ride. 40kph in the winter in the city is fine, if you live in Florida. Here, we don't have good snow clearance, it is often wet, and there is salt.
Look to the dutch, they don't look like that stoopid graphic with the alien that heads this post.
Ed
Since I can't magically
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 16:46Since I can't magically "adapt" to winter by lopping 15 ikm off my commute, I need to be able to make good time, or not ride at all. I prefer the former where at all possible. In addition, because I can't adapt to winter by doing all my riding on physically-separated bicycle routes, I'm going to have to be ready to get wet and salty and filthy. Cotton jeans aren't the hot ticket here, never mind wool coats.
I don't care what you wear or ride, as long as I can get safely past you and be on my way. (All-black isn't a great idea, but hey.)
Kevin (not verified)
You are absolutely right. As
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 18:46You are absolutely right. As with most things cycling, the Dutch know exactly how to cycle in winter. Take a look at them doing it in the snow at:
http://www.youtube.com/markenlei#p/c/F2C046E49FA49F5A/0/2rETLfzQrIw
Among other things, I saw:
A child being carried in a cargo bike (at 4:22)
At least four people riding on rear racks.
Three policemen riding together (at two different places)
All perfectly normal in getting around the city.
Kevin Love
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Yeah, sure... look to the
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 19:29Yeah, sure... look to the dutch for information on how to handle cycling in snow and winter. Good idea!
I'll get you a pair of wooden clogs also Kevin, after all they're better than neoprene booties or winter boots because they iz frum da nederlandz and what is from the netherlands is cycling gopsel to you.
Larry (not verified)
Aside from the fact that no
Sun, 12/26/2010 - 10:27Aside from the fact that no one really wears wooden clogs there anymore (except for a few farmers and gardeners), there are a few ideas we could be taking from the Netherlands as far as sharing the road, cyclist/driver training, the cycling/transit interface. However, we don't really have a way of fitting cycling infrastructure into much of our existing car-based road network. Those videos that people like to post show cyclists riding in segregated lanes (with their own signals and signs) on largely flat terrain or in urban centres where there isn't much room for cars either. Those classic Dutch bikes (esp. the ones with 0-3 gears) are heavy and a real pain on inclines or in a strong headwind. Ask someone who has moved here from the Netherlands whether the cycling conditions are anywhere near comparable, or whether they'd ride their grandparents' ponderous Batavus tourer here.
Seymore Bikes
I miss less than one cycling
Fri, 12/17/2010 - 22:46I miss less than one cycling day per year due to heavy snow fall. Being fashionable is one thing, but arriving at work numbed by cold with slush soaked feet is out of the question.
Kevin (not verified)
From the Dutch city of
Sat, 12/18/2010 - 05:02From the Dutch city of Leiden, cycling after the recent blizzard at:
http://cyclingwithoutahelmet.blogspot.com/
Eugenics doesn'... (not verified)
dances with self there is no
Sat, 12/18/2010 - 10:02dances with self there is no reason to get personal or to make disparaging remarks about people of certain nationalities.
The fact is that for those 2km trips you do not need all of that gear if you have the right bike, gear like that is a few days a year, for trips longer than 2km. Normal clothes are completely functional with an enclosed chain and full fenders, real fenders not thin fashion fenders.
For a 15km commute normal clothes with a thin oversuit of technical materials would do just fine. Or just gaiters, and only if it is wet. If it is cold like say -10 slush isn't a problem. A good dutch bike would have you covering that distance in the city in just over an hour, peacefully and without getting out of breath.
Many people think that maybe they aren't "real" if they don't approach riding with some weird combat mentality. That is ridiculous. It is also something that keeps cycling from taking hold. North Americans have been convinced that biking is ;
A. a battle
B. a race
C. a test
D. risky
but we know that it is not statistically risky, that we are not fighting or racing, or at least not being raced (except by some fool cyclist maybe) and that anyone can bike commute, so it is not a test.
Then why do we cyclists and bike stores constantly push "performance" equipment? Road bikes, MTB, hybrids with barely relaxed geometries taken from road and mtb? 30 gears and full suspension?
Some think it is because this gear breaks so easily, is usually built to be replaced rather than repaired and that it often does not suit the stated need of the buyer (just want to ride around a bit, not Lance) that bike sellers know they can charge more for performance gear, and expect more repeat business.
That is probably partly true.
But it is mostly misconceptions on the bike consumers part. They have been told, usually by bike people, that it is a battle, and a race, it is risky, and a test. Because bike people like to romanticize. Is there nothing else you could romanticize? Because you could get more (regular) asses on the seats if you pushed proper city bikes to people in the city.
Just saying, the Lance/Rambo/Gearhead mentality holds back cycling as a mere transportation in the city, despite the fact that workable cycling as mere transportation represents the largest prospective market & thereby the largest number of asses in seats.
Asses n seats, the one thing that makes us all safer.
Eugenics doesn'... (not verified)
Ed I just noted your reply,
Sat, 12/18/2010 - 10:11Ed I just noted your reply, your complaint that you cannot adapt?
You cannot bend space it is true but you can bend time. We demand that motorists take winter conditions into consideration by adding time to their commute, are you so special that you cannot do the same as a cyclist?
Yes, you think so, and you need to remember that it is not up to me to make sure you can get past me safely, it is up to you. If you cannot you must not. That's the law, but I'm sure that doesn't apply to you either all safely tucked into your car. I mean, all safely tucked into your car commuter mode of thinking.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Let me try again, since
Sun, 12/19/2010 - 12:24Let me try again, since somehow the last posting was deleted.
I am not Rambo or a gearhead, you want to exchange "insults" that is fine. Sometimes a bit of kit is going to do you a lot of good. One day you're going to smirk at the guy in a space-suit and get covered head to toe in salty slush from a bus going through a giant pot-hole.
I'm not making fun of the dutch, but you people want to copy everything. You desperately are going to make the damn clog fit. To me, it is quite the tragic comedy when people in Canada naively go around trying to emulate a dutch cyclist because dutch cyclists obviously know better. I'm sure the smug people who think a dutch bicycle is the best ride have to eat humble pie in the winter a lot. It is possible they don't know other options exist or that they're too ignorant or proud to try something new. This probably explains why the "dutch is better" or "style over speed" crowd are a bunch of haters(even though they try to be polite about it). They've basically set themselves up and I have to laugh when people make postings and snide remarks about how another, individual, cyclist dresses because I know why they're doing it.
Eugenics doesn'... (not verified)
"making fun of the
Sun, 12/19/2010 - 16:55"making fun of the dutch"
"you people"
"they're too ignorant"
"a bunch of haters"
All the applicable phrases from the above post, condensed for your convenience.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Come on, you've got to me
Sun, 12/19/2010 - 18:06Come on, you've got to me kidding me.
Why don't you try speaking like an adult Miss. Eugenics instead of trying to make me out as the great satan - LOL.
The Unusually T...
In my opinion, there are very
Sun, 12/19/2010 - 18:31In my opinion, there are very few things that are absolutely essential for winter cycling:
Other, non-essential things can make cycling in winter more enjoyable. Like fenders, goggles (clear glasses work great too), and booties. Personally, I ride with my clipless pedals in the winter. It's not insane, I can get my feet out of my pedals just as fast as anyone with flat pedals. However, if you've only been riding with clipless for a little while, and feel at all uncomfortable, pick up a cheap set of flats to last you through the winter.
Studded tires can add a huge deal of safety. Riding over ice the difference in grip is huge, and most of these tires will come with some sort of puncture resistance built in. The downside? Price. Most start at $100 and go up from there. People do make their own, but then you have to calculate for a set of knobbies, 500 wood screws and a lot of man hours. In most situations above minus 10 degrees, puncture resistant tires with adequate water siping will work just fine.
As for "the war", cycling is not a war. The majority of cyclists are sane people, who do not assume that they own the road, and want to get to their destination safely and in a reasonable amount of time. If you're riding a bike, it's likely going to be much faster than the TTC and in rush hour especially, faster than driving. Riding a bike in the winter is the same as driving a car - take your time. Leave lots of space between yourself and other road users and if you feel unsafe, signal and pull over. If you operate your road vehicle, be it car or bicycle, the same way you do in dry and warm conditions, you desperately need a reality check.
Ed
I suspect that none of the
Mon, 12/20/2010 - 11:10I suspect that none of the people who are trying to tell me how easy and comfortable it would be to ride in from Long Branch (Brown's Line and Lake Shore) to Queen and Yonge on a Dutch bike, wearing "normal" clothes, have actually tried this type of commute, two or three or four times a week, week in and week out.
I say this because I don't see these kinds of riders anywhere on my ride outside of downtown. The long-distance commuters ride, at a minimum, sporty hybrids. The South Etobicoke lost-my-license crowd of course ride in their normal clothes on whatever secondhand bike they can get, but I doubt they're going downtown..
Anyone wanting to show me how easy it is to ride in on a Dutch bike in regular clothes, let me know. I'll meet you at Long Branch station at 7 AM-ish, and we'll ride in together. I'll take my time so you can keep up. I'll also insist that you actually stop at stop signs, red lights, and behind open streetcar doors. Then, in the evening, let's get together at Queen and Yonge and ride back to Long Branch, say around 4:15 PM.
Heck, I'll cover your GO train fare to get out to Long Branch in the morning, and the fare to get back to downtown or wherever in the evening. Any takers?
donna (not verified)
how many km is that and how
Thu, 12/23/2010 - 19:48how many km is that and how long does it take you? I ride my loop frame bike from Coxwell and Danforth to King and Bay every day and it takes me 30-40 min. Have been commuting for two years now. I ride in my work clothes but take the weather and seasons into account. Before I splurged on my new bike I purchased an Electra cruiser. I say to each his own. It was all those lady bloggers on vintage bikes that got me thinking I should start riding to work because the subway is such a slog and I had finally moved close enough to my job downtown that biking was actually a better option. I love it and my loop frame bike and don't feel the need to prove anything to anyone.
Ed
Hi Donna; If you're asking
Fri, 12/24/2010 - 07:47Hi Donna;
If you're asking me, it's between 18.5 km and 20.3 km, depending on the route I take. (That's about 2.5 times longer than your commute: google cycling gives a distance of 7.8 km via Dundas St. E for your ride.)
The shortest route (across Queen from Roncesvalles) can be under 50 minutes. The longer route is going to be a bit over 50 minutes--longer distance but fewer stops. Even in really bad headwinds along the lakeshore, I haven't yet taken more than an hour.
By the way, I'm sure I could cut an easy five minutes off my ride if I didn't stop at stop signs, red lights, or behind streetcar doors (both on Lake Shore and on Queen).
That being said, when I had a shortish 5 km commute, I still wore cycling clothes, even though the ride was fifteen minutes or less. We had a change room at work, which was really nice. Right now, I have to change in the washroom, which is not so nice.
There's someone else in my work group who rides in from Allen and Eglinton (to Queen and Yonge). His ride is about half mine, but he also wears cycling clothes and changes in the washroom into work clothes. He's been touting the benefits of waterproof booties; I'm resisting and will try to keep wearing my almost-thirty-year-old Avocet cycling shoes (with the ribs on the sole to engage the pedals).
donna (not verified)
how many km is that and how
Thu, 12/23/2010 - 19:51how many km is that and how long does it take you? I ride my loop frame bike from Coxwell and Danforth to King and Bay every day and it takes me 30-40 min. Have been commuting for two years now. I ride in my work clothes but take the weather and seasons into account. Before I splurged on my new bike I purchased an Electra cruiser. I say to each his own. It was all those lady bloggers on vintage bikes that got me thinking I should start riding to work because the subway is such a slog and I had finally moved close enough to my job downtown that biking was actually a better option. I love it and my loop frame bike and don't feel the need to prove anything to anyone.
Ed
Oh, and I forgot to
Mon, 12/20/2010 - 15:45Oh, and I forgot to mention.
Yes, I like to go fast. If I was stuck in a jam of Dutch cyclists, I'd find an alternate route (in Toronto, it means staying off College, for example) or walk.
It's funny that 'advocates' whose self-declared agenda is showing that bicycling is natural and requires no special equipment or preparation (other, of course, than an expensive heavy Dutch-style bike with chaincase) are arguing against those of us with the experience to say "It's not that simple".
Yeah, I started riding some pretty good disances on a single-speed and no special clothes around 1975, but I figured out by the early 1980s that proper bicycle shorts and a "ten speed" were way better options. (Five or six years....I guess I'm a slow learner. I'm also cheap. The Avocet cycling shoes I purchased back in the early '80s are still in use ['looks like a dog ate them' was a recent comment from a fellow commuter]; my one single MEC cycling jacket is from the early '90s at the latest, and my commuter bike is a 1987 Steve Bauer Chinook that I purchased new....and the saddle is a totally beat-up Avocet Touring II I splurged on in the early '80s. I'm not exactly the Big Spender on equipment here--if it works, keep using it!.)
First of all, Rob Ford and his voters aren't going to magically jump on a Dutch-style bicycle even if you gave it to them for free, with chocolate pies in the basket.
Second, when Joe or Suzy Average Non-Bike-Riding Citizen is put on a Dutch-style bike in Long Branch, the 'advocates' seem to to think that they'll arrive in a reasonable time at Queen and Yonge unruffled with their clothing not beat up. Somehow the heavy Dutch bicycle warps time and space and makes a long tedious ride (at least in adverse weather) magically short and delightful.
In the end, adhering to the "bicycling is an everyday activity that anyone can do" mantra requires these advocates to dispute and deny the experience of people who actually ride their bicycles and have plenty of experience in what works and what doesn't work. I mean, I have ridden for 35 years and have probably averaged 2000-3000 km per year over that time. Now you're telling me that I'm all wrong, and that hopping on a heavy bike with my "normal" clothes is going to be a huge treat compared to riding a resonably fast bike, wearing clothing designed for the purpose? That's pretty funny!
If the people who actually ride their bicycles are saying "it's not as magically simple as you claim", why should you expect the general public to suddenly take leave of their senses and collectively splurge on Dutch bikes? That's pretty funny too!
RANTWICK
I agree that the astronaut
Tue, 12/21/2010 - 17:01I agree that the astronaut suit is not necessary, but I also think how serious you are about riding no matter what makes a huge difference. Serious weather and greater distances do demand more serious gear. In addition, a nice puffy coat that is good for walking is a recipe for sweating too much and overheating in my case.
I notice the article recommends ski goggles for days when there is blowing snow... for myself, I really like having them for temps anywhere below -5C, snow or not. They make a world of difference in terms of comfort.
The concerns people have with fashion or style are irrelevant to me. I have neither when I'm on the bike, but I am able to ride in almost any weather.
All that said, whatever floats your boat is cool with me! Just happy to see more bikes in winter.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Ok, i found it.. watch these
Thu, 12/23/2010 - 11:20Ok, i found it.. watch these certain "European" cyclists!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lqo4hwnJt6Y
Kinda makes you wonder if they're really invincible and have winter cycling all neatly sorted.
Maybe some lightly studded tires and a helmet, hmmm.
Larry (not verified)
It's not as if the drivers
Sun, 12/26/2010 - 19:19It's not as if the drivers there are any better at dealing with ice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU5mIEtrICM&feature=related
Larry (not verified)
And another thing: Cyclists
Tue, 12/28/2010 - 11:36And another thing:
Cyclists fall when the road is icy and hasn't been salted? Who knew!
donna (not verified)
how many km is that and how
Thu, 12/23/2010 - 19:52how many km is that and how long does it take you? I ride my loop frame bike from Coxwell and Danforth to King and Bay every day and it takes me 30-40 min. Have been commuting for two years now. I ride in my work clothes but take the weather and seasons into account. Before I splurged on my new bike I purchased an Electra cruiser. I say to each his own. It was all those lady bloggers on vintage bikes that got me thinking I should start riding to work because the subway is such a slog and I had finally moved close enough to my job downtown that biking was actually a better option. I love it and my loop frame bike and don't feel the need to prove anything to anyone.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Larry, apparently those who
Tue, 12/28/2010 - 19:42Larry, apparently those who don't bother with a cheapy pair of studded tires($120 at mec) city can't or won't put salt everywhere you know and it's bad for the lake!
Larry (not verified)
d_w_t, I'm referring to the
Wed, 12/29/2010 - 12:36d_w_t, I'm referring to the video you posted, not what Toronto does. The situation in which roads become sheets of (black) ice is more common in the Netherlands than here; winter tires, however, are less common there. The guy who posted that video to YouTube specifically told commenters to stop complaining that salt had not been scattered on that stretch of road/bike path (hard to tell what it is) because it had in fact been salted since the video was taken.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Larry, they need faster
Wed, 12/29/2010 - 21:17Larry, they need faster working salt or better tires!
To be honest, some of the cyclists were cooking that corner pretty good and the studs wouldn't have helped.
Larry (not verified)
No, they needed to put salt
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 10:04No, they needed to put salt on that stretch sooner. There wasn't any applied until after the footage of all those wipeouts was shot. And yes, they were going pretty fast and probably not seeing the ice.
Dianna (not verified)
Great ideas minus the pink
Wed, 12/29/2010 - 15:38Great ideas minus the pink button. We're not ALL pinko kooks.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Dianna, on a bicycle? You are
Wed, 12/29/2010 - 21:14Dianna, on a bicycle? You are a pinko kook... that is the joke of wearing the button... nobody i know who has one is actually a pinko(ok maybe that one guy)... don't be so literal!
Eugenics doesn'... (not verified)
Direct Quote- “Well,
Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:45Direct Quote-
“Well, actually, I’m wearing pinko for all the pinkos out there that ride bicycles and everything, I thought I’d get it in."
So you see, Mr. Cherry referred only to pinkos or what he presumes to be pinkos who also ride a bicycle and everything.
Dianne is correct, if she is not a pinko, or in Mr. Cherry's context, a person whose political ideology is to the left of center who he felt attacked him editorially, then the button does not apply.
In fact, if we take Mr. Cherry at his word, anyone who is center or right of center was not the subject of his statement and no blanket statement on bicyclists was made.
Now, if we make up what he said or just change the words to suit our sensitive, sensitive, sweet sugar lollipops view of how we would like things to be despite the reality everyone else contends with, then in that case it is a clever button.
Good on you Dianne for daring to acknowledge what you know.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Good for you eugenics for
Mon, 01/03/2011 - 23:28Good for you eugenics for being far too literal. You really got down to what Don Cherry was saying! I wonder just who these pinkos are anyways.