Dave Meslin makes a pitch on why Mayor Rob Ford may not be so anti-bike. Ford made headlines with his quotes about cyclists "swimming with the sharks" and in this video which was distributed before last fall's election, Ford is quoted as saying "Cyclists are a pain in the ass". Meslin's point is that if we had listened through the entire video (a rambling 7 minutes long) that we would have heard something more supportive coming from the mouth of the then-councillor.
Ford says “cyclists are putting their lives at risk every time they go on the road,” and his solution is both simple and practical: “We have to widen our sidewalks, split them basically in half, pedestrians on one side, closest to the stores, and the cyclists on the other side. It will work in this city.”
This might not be the right solution for every street, but the idea of physically separating cyclists from motor traffic, where possible, is a good one. It encourages more people to try cycling. The concept is not new, nor radical. It’s just common sense, and that’s why separated lanes are being used in cities all across the world, from Berlin to Manhattan to Montreal.
It’s easy to demonize and judge each other based on our worst moments and quotes. But upon closer inspection, Ford’s infamous anti-bike speech happens to contain one of the most supportive bike policy proposals ever put forward on the floor of city council. And during his campaign, Ford proposed “a comprehensive network of bicycle trails across the city to provide a safe, convenient ‘backbone’ for bicycle transportation across Toronto.”
This is just one example of how nothing is black and white at city hall, although it is often appealing to pretend otherwise. It’s much easier to break things down into bike vs. car, downtown vs. suburb, or left vs. right. But bicycle safety is not a left-wing issue, nor is it a downtown issue.
Cycling is a billion-dollar industry in Canada. More than 65 per cent of Toronto households have at least one bicycle and the fastest growth is actually in suburban areas. I grew up in suburban North York and rode my bike all the time on quiet streets, in parks and on the sidewalks of Bayview or York Mills. All my neighbours had bicycles, too. And while Don Cherry talks about “pinkos who ride bicycles,” anyone who has ever stepped into a suburban Canadian Tire knows bikes are as much a part of our culture as hockey.
Not all cycling advocates aren't buying Meslin's argument:
and:
I've been known to be pretty critical of the mayor and his rhetoric, and I'm not going to really retract anything I said. I believe the mayor should take responsibility for making the streets more dangerous. Since the election I've had a feeling that cyclists have been on the receiving end of increased anger from motorists. Still, I will agree with Meslin that it isn't black and white. Ford has supported (off-road) bike paths where they don't increase (car) traffic congestions. I would never have imagined a right-wing councillor like Minnan-Wong come forward with a plan for a comprehensive separated bike lane network downtown and say things like this:
“My bike plan is a recognition of [the fact that] bikes exist. They’re here to stay. There have been too many accidents and we need to do something about that. I don’t believe that bike lanes should go on every single street. But I do believe they deserve a reasonable option.”
I don't have to agree with everything that Minnan-Wong is doing but in this bike plan I fully support him.
Comments
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Sure sure, haha... there was
Mon, 03/14/2011 - 09:55Sure sure, haha... there was no war on the bicycle waged during the election by Mr. Ford.
Don't worry guys, Rob Ford is secretly trying to support bicycles, i picked a few sentences out here... see(that was convincing)
Nevermind Don Cherry. All Rob Ford wanted todo is shout he loves bicycles it's just those evil bicycle advocates stopping him... don't support those bicycle advocates.
herb
A valid point, Dances with
Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:34A valid point, Dances with Traffic. I tend to agree with what I perceive is Meslin's approach: offer a way for Ford to follow through on some of his bike-positive comments. I don't think that Meslin is under the illusion that Rob Ford has been a cyclist's best friend in the past. In fact, he's voted against allocating money to bicycle infrastructure a number of times.
We'll have a much better idea of how Ford will vote if and when Minnan-Wong puts forward his separated bike lane plan.
dances_with_traffic (not verified)
Sorry, Herb, my eyes aren't
Wed, 03/16/2011 - 00:39Sorry, Herb, my eyes aren't reflecting that "good cop" Minnan-Wong's carrots, perhaps I am a cynic, but who can blame me?
Ed
I don't know if Ford is
Mon, 03/14/2011 - 10:06I don't know if Ford is anti-bike, but I do see that he is clueless. "It will work in this city?" Ha. His idea of a wider sidewalk with bicycles on one side and pedestrians on the other is horrible, awful, ridiculous.
For a few years, probably in the 1990s, the Humber path between Old Mill and Dundas was divided in just this way: bidirectional bike travel on one side, bi-directional pedestrians on the other side. At least that's what the signs and pavement markings said. In practice, you could never tell where someone (pedestrian or cyclist) was going to go. Would they stay in "their half" of the trail? If so, would they stay in the right hand part of their half of the trail? Oy, as practice for dodgeball it was great; as a safe way to handle walkers and cyclists on one trail, not so much.
Note that the situation did not improve over the two or three years I recall this was in place. People did not learn. It was too confusing and went against learned behaviour to "keep to the right".
Trying this on sidewalks? Might work where there's no one walking on the sidewalks, out in the suburbs. Is utter fantasy for busy sidewalks such as College or Queen or Bay. I'll note also that the proposed placing of cyclists brings them really close to utility poles, which is not exactly nice.
It won't work in this city, unless "this city" has the pedestrian and cycling use of Rexdale Boulevard. In which case, who cares where people walk or ride? There aren't any serious numbers doing either.
Larry (not verified)
It might not be 'horrible,
Mon, 03/14/2011 - 15:41It might not be 'horrible, awful, ridiculous' (such optimism!) if the bike and pedestrian portions are at different levels. Can we send Ford on a fact-finding mission to The Hague or something?
Peter Smith (not verified)
Either you believe in bike
Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:15Either you believe in bike lanes on every single street/road/bridge/tunnel, especially the most major corridors, or you don't believe in biking. Simple.
Pedal Pusher (not verified)
Peter I like your Bush like
Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:32Peter I like your Bush like attitude of you are either with us or against us.
By your definition I don't believe in biking, by my definition I do, I ride to work year round including blizzard days.
I do not see the point of a bike lane of every street. I'd like some nice separated biking corridors but I want to ride in traffic when I want to.
hamish (not verified)
Ms. Garcia of the CU was
Wed, 03/16/2011 - 09:43Ms. Garcia of the CU was quoted in the Pedal mag's annual Bike Show issue p. 30 in an urban cycling summary piece partially as follows - that the "most obvious change is the new administration. To date, this change has been very positive for cycling in Toronto."
I'm having a LOT of difficulty being that positive, and to some extent being overly positive is delusional.
A.R. (not verified)
Ford has populist tendencies
Fri, 03/18/2011 - 22:52Ford has populist tendencies for better or for worse. Get a group of people to complain and some strategists like Meslin and he might listen. Representing a distant suburban ward, there weren't too many people complaining about utilitarian cycling issues to him before.
herb
TorontoCranks makes some good
Sat, 03/19/2011 - 01:02TorontoCranks makes some good points regarding Ford's bike-friendliness. His proposal to build a "backbone" of a network of bike paths comes from the right-wing, pro-highway group, the so-called Toronto Party. On their site, "Get Toronto Moving" they say:
In principle they oppose bike lanes since they take up valuable road space that should only be allocated to cars. Instead they propose bike paths in "nearby" off-road corridor. Take a close look at the map in that link. Their so-called bike network leaves huge gaps all over. In fact, the entire central Toronto is a gap. Instead of taking a bike lane on Harbord or Gerrard, I'm guessing they'd like you to take the hydro corridor north of Dupont, or go all the way down to the waterfront trail.
Aside from the laughable idiocy of it all, TorontoCranks makes the good point that Ford's promise of a network of bike paths may be just like his promise of new highways - not going to happen, but it buys votes.
A.R. (not verified)
Rob Ford didn't promise to
Sun, 03/20/2011 - 13:38Rob Ford didn't promise to build new highways! (!!!)
locutas_of_spragge
Reading the "Toronto Party"
Sat, 03/19/2011 - 16:27Reading the "Toronto Party" web site, I find myself flummoxed. They call, among other things, for a bridge between Roncesvalles and Old Weston Road. Aside from the matter of the distance, why those streets? In a similar manner, while I applaud the efforts to build bicycle routes along the rail corridors, the map provided by the Toronto Party doesn't locate the existing multi-use railpath between Dupont and Dundas correctly.
Kevin (not verified)
Yes, there are numerous
Sun, 03/20/2011 - 11:45Yes, there are numerous mistakes on their map. Two more examples are: 1. Showing the Kay Gardner Beltline trail between Croham and Marlee as "proposed" when it is actually the best-paved and maintained part of this trail. I particularily like the excellent bridge over Dufferin Street. 2. Not taking the proposed West End Rail Trail through to Union Station, as currently planned.
It always seemed rather bizarre to me the continued failure to close the gap between the excellent Richview trail and the excellent Beltline trail. Closing this gap of a little less than 3 km would result in a continuous, fully-separated routed along or close to Eglinton all the way from Hwy 427 to Yonge Street. Paving the unpaved bits of the Beltline east of Allan Road would also be good.
Kevin Love