The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee (PWIC) voted to reinstall the fifth lane of Jarvis and remove the Jarvis bike lanes after the installation of the Sherbourne Street separated bike lanes at its meeting on June 23, 2011. Cyclists, the Toronto Cyclists Union in particular, supported the Sherbourne separated bike lanes but were against creating a trade-off with the Jarvis bike lanes. The number one argument used to push for removing the Jarvis bike lanes was that it slowed down traffic (by about 2 to 5 minutes). In the report Transportation Services staff had noted that travel times could be improved by installing an advanced left turn signal at Jarvis and Gerrard streets. The staff have installed the advanced left and have studied the results. It's time that PWIC released the results so the public knows if it has helped resolve travel time issues.
At PWIC’s June 23. 2011 meeting, PWIC had before it a June 9 , 2011 City staff report, Bikeway Network 2011 Update. City staff advised in the report, referring to Jarvis Street, that:
Travel times increased by approximately two minutes in both directions following the installation of the bike lanes in the a.m. peak hour and by three to five minutes in both directions in the p.m. peak hour.
- Much of the increased travel time could be attributed to the delays and queues experienced at the Jarvis Street/Gerrard Street East intersection, particularly in the northbound direction during the p.m. peak period.
- The introduction of an advanced left turn phase in the northbound direction at this intersection, scheduled this summer, will reduce the delays at this intersection and the overall travel times between Queen Street East and Charles Street East.
An advanced left turn phase in the northbound direction of Jarvis Street at the intersection of Jarvis Street and Gerrard Street East was introduced in the summer/fall of 2011. New stats for the intersection of Gerrard and Jarvis have been internally generated by the City and a travel time analysis may be available that would help the public and the Committee in understanding if there has been a change in the delay experienced by motorists on Jarvis Street during rush hour after the change in signal timing.
PWIC should release the new travel time statistics now so that the community can be able to assess the real impact, if any, of the removal of the 5th lane of Jarvis and the installation of the Jarvis Street bike lanes.
Comments
Seymore Bikes
The PWIC has a responsibility
Mon, 04/16/2012 - 23:08The PWIC has a responsibility to make this information available to the public if it is to justify the $250,000 the city plans to spend to put the 5th lane back. You can call it respect for tax payers, or common sense, or a way of demonstrating that there isn't some malicious intent to do away with anything David Miller had a hand in creating.
Random cyclist (not verified)
why not just make an access
Sat, 04/21/2012 - 08:28why not just make an access to information request for them?
Random cyclist (not verified)
There are days when its 30
Sun, 04/22/2012 - 22:54There are days when its 30 min too.
Put the lanes on Sherbourne... they're wider, traffic is calmer and you can expand them to Queens Quay.
scunny (not verified)
A former professional
Mon, 04/23/2012 - 10:13A former professional cyclist/motorist friend who lives in the area anecdotally reports no appreciable difference in local four-wheel travel times.
But asking the PWIC for info presents a unique problem these days, especially if the documents requested don't back their Ford-appointed majority, ideological agenda.
The procedural manoeuvre - that led to the PWIC's allegedly tainted advice to City Council regarding that body's rescinded approval for the already existing cycling-safer infrastructure on Jarvis - appears to have been orchestrated to purposefully ignore the safety impact upon all actively mobile Torontonians using Jarvis Street.
John Parker's late amendment at the PWIC was voted on and passed, without discussion, by a majority of committee members. Evidence exists to suggest that the Mayor's office was also tied to the manipulated process although Rob Ford denies personal knowledge of any involvement. He has tried to isolate Denzil Minnan-Wong as the man responsible.
http://youtu.be/F-F5Wf5_8FM
Thanks for sticking with Herb!!! ( :-)