As first reported just over a week ago by Martin Koob at bikeToronto, new bike lanes have been installed on The Queensway between Windemere Ave. and Claude Ave. (map).
I often don't like bike lanes, especially when they are poorly designed or implemented, or when their state of disrepair makes me want to avoid them altogether. However, I think this is a welcome addition to this busy arterial road, and through this part of the city. Over the past week I had a few opportunities to ride this section of new bike lane at various times of day. Read on for more of my thoughts and photos.
The Queensway is a busy arterial road that connects the Queen-King-Roncessvalles intersection right out to Mississauga across southern Etobicoke. There's a streetcar right-of-way down the middle of it from Roncessvalles to around the Humber River. It's really not much to look at or write home about, as it's mainly a utilitarian road serving the motoring public.
From a cycling perspective, this section of road connects a few key locations nearby:
- High Park
- Parkdale / Queen West
- The lake shore and Martin Goodman Trail
- The #19 North bike route that goes up Ellis Ave to connect to the Runnymede Rd. bike lanes
- The off-road recreational trail along the south side of High Park and Grenadier Pond.
- It comes a bit short of connecting to the Humber River trail system to the west.
What do I like about this bike lane? First of all, it's wide enough to comfortably ride in without feeling like I'm in a gutter and motorists aren't buzzing right past my shoulder. Also, there's no parking/stopping allowed anywhere along here, so getting doored it not an issue. It seems like the motorists stay a bit further to the left now that the bike lane markings are installed. Perhaps the narrower lanes slow down traffic too, but that's purely speculation (is 60km/h still a reasonable limit for this road?). There are very few intersections or driveways along this road, so turning conflicts are minimized. The bike lane markings become dashed at intersections, as they should be, to allow motorists to properly merge before making their turns.
Dislikes? There are few. This is actually a pretty well designed and implemented bike lane. My only major concern is that when riding east, the bike lane ends somewhat suddenly. While riding quickly downhill, cyclists have to be prepared to merge back into the rest of the traffic, while also navigating around a bend in the road and at least six bumpy and slippery steel manhole covers. Extending this bike lane further east to make this corner safer would require moving a sidewalk and lamp post, or removing another lane of traffic. I doubt either will happen soon. However, I think it would help if the bumpy manhole covers were smoothed out somehow, and maybe even treated with some kind of grippy substance so they wouldn't be slippery. The transition area out of the bike lane should be longer, and perhaps a sign posted a bit sooner, so that cyclists are alerted to the lane change earlier. I always hated riding around this bend, even before the bike lanes went in.
It would also be nice if the bike lanes could be extended west to at least cross the nasty Humber River bridge to connect to the trails, and further west to the upcoming Stephen Ave. lanes. Perhaps if the Queensway-Kingsway interchange gets re-designed, this could become a reality.
Anyway, there you have it. Another 1.8km of bike lane in the city. Plenty more to go before we catch up to the Bike Plan, but I won't complain about the good lanes that actually get installed. Now I hope we can just keep this bike lane from turning into another taxi parking spot!
Comments
AlanM (not verified)
Vehicles in bike lanes
Wed, 11/21/2007 - 09:10In Toronto and surrounding area, what do the traffic and parking bylaws say about stopping/parking in bike lanes.
Note, I'm talking about real bike lanes, so marked and signed with diamonds, not about paved shoulder strips.
Note, also important to distinquish between parking, which is stopped with engine off and/or driver out of the car, versus stopping. which occurs when driver stops but remains in car (with engine running).
In Region of Waterloo, this is an ongoing discussion at the Region and city level. Local traffic/parking bylaws state that buses and taxis may stop in the bike lane to take on or discharge passengers, and that other drivers may also "momentarily stop" to take on or discharge passengers. (Assuming of course the section of road is not posted as "No Stopping" as it is along school properties.) However, parking in bike lanes is prohibitted.
This means that delivery vehicles cannot stop/park in bike lanes. It also means, however, due to lenient interpretation, that drivers can stop in the bike lanes, adjacent to school properties (but outside the "No Stopping" zone), while waiting for kids to get out of school. As you might imagine, at the end of the school day, there's heavy traffic and a dangerous situation with the bike lanes blocked.
...Alan
Waterloo ON
Ben
Stopping vs. Parking
Wed, 11/21/2007 - 09:24Alan,
There is a by-law against parking in the bike lane. Once a year the parking enforcement officers will enforce this rule for a weekend.
I am not sure about stopping in the bike lane. I usually grind those people up and feed them to my cat (I'm vegetarian).
vic
Parking in bike lanes
Wed, 11/21/2007 - 10:25Alan,
In the case of this taxi, it is clearly stopped illegally even if there was no bike lane here, since it is marked as a No Stopping area. If there was no bike lane, and it was marked as "no parking", then the taxi could legally stop to pick up / drop off passengers.
Toronto parking regulations are explained pretty well here:
http://www.toronto.ca/transportation/parking/
The "Parking Regulations' and "FAQs" sections are the most useful.
They don't mention bike lanes specifically though... This PDF in the cycling section does though:
http://www.toronto.ca/cycling/bikeplan/pdf/bikelanes.pdf
-Vic
Kristen (not verified)
Vehicles in Bike Lanes
Wed, 11/21/2007 - 21:52Section 886 of the Municipal Code lays out the by-laws relating to bike lanes and vehicles stopping and driving in bike lanes. Basically, the only circumstance in which a private vehicle can stop in a bike lane is if they are actively involved in loading or unloading a person with a disability.
Taxis and school buses can stop in the bike lane if they are actively picking up or dropping off passengers. City vehicles and utility company vehicles (on City business), TTC vehicles and emergency vehicles can all drive and stop in the bike lane.
Darren_S
Oxymoron
Thu, 11/22/2007 - 01:07(on City business)
Does that qualify as an oxymoron?
I had many discussions with driver's of City vehicles who parked in the bike lane outside a City maintenance building at River and Dundas. Even though they would be sitting there eating their lunch they would claim they are on City business attending to an emergency, they would repeatedly claim that the building is flooded. After a half dozen or so timesI figured that the building must have worst floods than the Titanic. To be fair, sometimes the supervisors claimed that the guys had the 'runs' and had to park there.
The irony of course is that the building has its very own large parking lot.
geoffrey (not verified)
The Queensway bike lanes
Wed, 11/21/2007 - 09:43The Queensway bike lanes should begin at Roncesvalles and run uninterrupted to the Queensways conclusion at Glengarry in Mississauga. Hopefully this is a beginning to that end and not just another bit of infrastructure that will be abandoned to rot and accumulate parked cars like the South Kingsway bikelanes or be absorbed by road construction like the historic Royal York bikelanes or to be absorbed by country club frontage like the Scarlett Road grade separated bike path and the north Weston Road bike path.
Tanya Q (not verified)
why don't they go further?
Wed, 11/21/2007 - 11:19Queensway bike lanes seem like a very welcome addition, its sad that the distance is so short. Does this correspond with the section of Queensway that was recently redone? So as other parts are redone we can expect a continuance of the lane?
vic
Going further
Wed, 11/21/2007 - 12:02Yes, this corresponds to the section of The Queensway that was recently re-done.
To make the lanes goes further east to connect to King-Queen-Roncessvalles (and the proposed signed route along King/Dufferin/Liberty) they would have to either:
* Get rid of a regular traffic lane
* Widen the road, which would mean moving sidewalks, light/utility poles, encroaching on some of the land next to the road
* Get rid of the streetcar ROW...heh...
There would also be the issue of putting a bike lane over the huge mess of streetcar tracks in front of the Queen/Roncessvalles streetcar yard. That would have to be designed to be VERY wide so that cyclists have room to manouever, and not get schmucked if they fall.
Going further west, it seems like there's enough room for a bike lane just west of Windemere. I think the road is just as wide there, but I could be wrong. But very shortly after that is the South Kingsway interchange mess.... If this gets knocked down and re-designed, I imagine they would plan to continue the bike lane through there. In its current state, I'm sure they could fit in a bike lane if they really wanted to, but it would be a challenge with the on/off ramps etc. Could make it easier to navigate if done well, but I'd hate to give cyclists a false sense of security riding through that awful mess.
As noted by Martin Koob, part of this bike lane wasn't actually in the Bike Plan...they just added it because the opportunity came up. But it would be great if there were more of these opportunities!
-Vic